MODEL FOR DETERMINING CANDIDATES FOR VILLAGE SOCIAL ASSISTANCE USING THE AHP–MOORA METHOD

Authors

  • Hardian Oktavianto Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember image/svg+xml
  • Dodik Aris Setiawan
  • Guruh Wijaya
  • Zainul Arifin
  • Henny Wahyu Sulistyo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33480/rp2qkd88

Keywords:

AHP, decision making, decision support system, MOORA, village social assistance

Abstract

Social assistance programs at the village level are one of the government's efforts to reduce poverty and improve community welfare. However, in practice, the process of determining eligible beneficiaries is often carried out manually, which may lead to subjectivity, inaccurate targeting, and a lack of transparency in decision-making. This study aims to develop a decision support system that assists village administrators in determining priority candidates for social assistance in a more objective and systematic manner. The proposed approach integrates the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) methods. The AHP method is used to determine the weight of each criterion through pairwise comparison matrices and consistency testing. Subsequently, the MOORA method is applied to normalize the decision matrix, calculate preference values, and rank the alternatives. The results show that AHP-MOORA can generate a priority ranking of potential social assistance beneficiaries. The calculated weights for the criteria respectively are Kepemilikan Tanah: 0.5579 (highest importance), Kondisi Rumah: 0.2633, Pekerjaan: 0.1219, Penghasilan: 0.0569 (lowest importance) and the value of CR is 0.0654, which is less than 0.1, indicating that the criteria weights are consistent. The ranking based on AHP-MOORA show significant differences than the earlier dataset. Based on sensitivity analysis, the high correlation values in all sensitivity tests show that the ranking results remain consistent. Furthermore, the system improves transparency and consistency in the decision-making process.

References

Adu, T. F., Mensah, L. D., Rockson, M. A. D., & Kemausuor, F. (2025). Decision support systems for waste-to-energy technologies: A systematic literature review of methods and future directions for sustainable implementation in Ghana. Heliyon, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42353

Alam Bhuiyan, M. M., & Hammad, A. (2023). A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Selecting the Most Sustainable Structural Material for a Multistory Building Construction. In Sustainability (Vol. 15, Issue 4, p. 3128). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043128

Anggraini, D., Lubis, A. P., & Akmal, A. (2022). IMPLEMENTASI METODE MFEPENERAPAN AHP-MOORA UNTUK KELOMPOK TANI PENERIMA BANTUAN ALSINTAN. JUTSI: Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi, 2(1 SE-Articles), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.33330/jutsi.v2i1.1515

Barman, J., Biswas, B., & Rao, K. S. (2024). A hybrid integration of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the multiobjective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) for landslide susceptibility zonation of Aizawl, India. Natural Hazards, 120(9), 8571–8596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06538-9

Dodevska, Z., Radovanović, S., Petrović, A., & Delibašić, B. (2023). When Fairness Meets Consistency in AHP Pairwise Comparisons. In Mathematics (Vol. 11, Issue 3, p. 604). https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030604

Elkady, S., Hernantes, J., & Labaka, L. (2024). Decision-making for community resilience: A review of decision support systems and their applications. Heliyon, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33116

Fang, H., Tao, Q., Chen, Q., & Delgado, M. (2025). When your neighbour is the village cadre: allocation of public resources in the social network. Applied Economics, 57(42), 6683–6698. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2386849

Fikri, I. (2023). Pengembangan Aplikasi Manajemen Peserta Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan Pada Dinas Sosial Kota Banjarbaru. Jurnal Teknologi, 13(1 SE-Articles), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.35134/jitekin.v13i1.94

Germundsson, N., & Stranz, H. (2024). Automating social assistance: Exploring the use of robotic process automation in the Swedish personal social services. International Journal of Social Welfare, 33(3), 647–658. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12633

Ginting, A. H., Widianingsih, I., Mulyawan, R., & Nurasa, H. (2023). Village Government’s Risk Management and Village Fund Administration in Indonesia. In Sustainability (Vol. 15, Issue 24, p. 16706). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416706

Ginting, A. H., Widianingsih, I., Mulyawan, R., & Nurasa, H. (2024). Village fund program in Cibeureum and Sukapura village, Bandung Regency, Indonesia: Problems, risks, and solutions. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2303452. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2303452

Grosh, Margaret, Leite, Phillippe, Wai-Poi, Matthew, & Tesliuc, Emil. (2022). A synopsis of ‘Revisiting Targeting in Social Assistance: A New Look at Old Dilemmas.’ Global Social Policy, 22(3), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181221121442

Kalan, O., Işık, M., & Yüksel, F. Ş. (2024). An Application Using ELECTRE and MOORA Methods in the Selection of International Airport Transfer Center (Hub) in Türkiye. In Applied Sciences (Vol. 14, Issue 17, p. 7678). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177678

Keenan, P. (2024). A scientometric analysis of multicriteria decision-making research. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(sup1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2024.2354642

Lukman, A., & Laluma, R. H. (2023). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Penerima Bantuan Sosial Dengan Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process. Digital Transformation Technology, 3(1 SE-Articles), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.47709/digitech.v3i1.2373

Merawati, L. K. (2024). Transparency and Community Trust in Village Government: Does Corruption Perception Matter? by H. Sofyani, R. Yaya, and Z. Saleh. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 44(3), 262–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2024.2400843

Panudju, A. T., Rahardja, S., Nurilmala, M., & Marimin, -. (2023). Decision Support System in Fisheries Industry: Current State and Future Agenda. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 13(2 SE-Articles), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.2.17914

Pertiwi, C., Oktarina, A., Suprianto, Y., Widjajawati, E., Alkadri, A., Nababan, F. E., Rucianawati, R., Aziz, N. L. L., Nadila, S. M., & Fitriana, N. (2025). The Effectiveness of Social Assistance Distribution Policy for Extreme Poverty Eradication in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 40(3 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.v40i3.10051

Ruíz-Ortega, D., García-Domingo, M., Fuentes, V., & De la Fuente-Robles, Y. (2025). The Impact of Prioritisation and Eligibility Criteria on Social Services Intake Processes: An International Systematic Review (1993–2024). In Social Sciences (Vol. 14, Issue 5, p. 262). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14050262

Ruja, I Nyoman, Sumarmi, & Idris. (2024). Programs, Opportunities, and Challenges in Poverty Reduction: A Systematic Review. Sage Open, 14(2), 21582440241256240. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241256242

Salsabila, S. (2023). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENILAIAN TENAGA KEPENDIDIKAN DENGAN METODE FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. Journal of Information Technology, 4(2 SE-Artikel), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.47292/joint.v4i2.73

Sania, G., Zufria, I., & Fakhriza, M. (2024). The Implementation of AHP and SAW Methods in Decision Support System to Determine BOS Fund Allocation. Journal of Information Technology, 4(1 SE-Articles), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.46229/jifotech.v4i1.869

Wang, Q., Tian, Z., & Zhu, S. (2024). Paired assistance and poverty alleviation: Experience and evidence from China. PLOS ONE, 19(2), e0297173. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297173

Wang, Z., Nabavi, S. R., & Rangaiah, G. P. (2024). Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Chemical and Process Engineering: Methods, Progress, and Potential. In Processes (Vol. 12, Issue 11, p. 2532). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112532

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

MODEL FOR DETERMINING CANDIDATES FOR VILLAGE SOCIAL ASSISTANCE USING THE AHP–MOORA METHOD. (2026). Jurnal Techno Nusa Mandiri, 23(1), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.33480/rp2qkd88

Similar Articles

1-10 of 192

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.