PENDAMPINGAN GURU DALAM PENGELOLAAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA BERBASIS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DENGAN PENDEKATAN ADMINISTRASI PENDIDIKAN MODERN

Authors

  • N Noviyanti Universitas Islam Kebangsaan Indonesia
  • Dwi Adhinda Junaidi Putri Universitas Almuslim image/svg+xml
  • Kiki Fajariani Universitas Almuslim image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33480/abdimas.v8i3.8476

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, digital assessment, educational administration, mathematics learning, teacher mentoring

Abstract

This community service program aimed to strengthen teachers’ capacity to manage AI-supported mathematics instruction through a modern educational administration approach. The program was conducted at SMPS Darul Ulum Tanoh Mirah and involved 18 teachers. It addressed teachers’ limited competence in integrating Artificial Intelligence into instructional planning, assessment, learning-media development, and administrative tasks. The activities comprised needs assessment, training, mentoring, hands-on practice, and evaluation through lectures, discussions, simulations, pre-tests, post-tests, Likert-scale questionnaires, and classroom implementation observations. The teachers were trained to use ChatGPT to develop teaching materials and lesson plans, AI-assisted digital quiz platforms to conduct assessments, and AI-supported design applications to create learning media. The results showed that the participants’ mean score increased from 65.3 on the pre-test to 84.7 on the post-test, representing an improvement of 19.4 points or 29.7%. The questionnaire results also indicated very high participant ratings, with the usefulness of the program and participant satisfaction each receiving a mean score of 4.6 out of 5. In addition, the teachers demonstrated improved ability to design technology-supported instructional materials, conduct digital assessments, and use student learning data for basic instructional decision-making. These findings indicate that structured AI training and mentoring can effectively enhance teachers’ professional competence and support more efficient, data-informed mathematics learning management.

Author Biographies

  • N Noviyanti, Universitas Islam Kebangsaan Indonesia

    Dosen Program Studi Informatika, Fakultas Komputeir dan Multimeidia, Univeirsitas Islam Keibangsaan Indoneisia

  • Dwi Adhinda Junaidi Putri, Universitas Almuslim

    Dosen Program Studi PGPAUD, Fakultas Keiguruan dan Ilmu Peindidikan, Univeirsitas Almuslim

  • Kiki Fajariani, Universitas Almuslim

    Dosen Program Studi PGSD, Fakultas Keiguruan dan Ilmu Peindidikan, Univeirsitas Almuslim

References

[1] F. Miao, W. Holmes, R. Huang, and H. Zhang, AI and education: guidance for policy-makers. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2021. doi: 10.54675/PCSP7350.

[2] F. Miao and W. Holmes, Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2023. doi: 10.54675/EWZM9535.

[3] F. Miao and M. Cukurova, AI competency framework for teachers. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2024. doi: 10.54675/ZJTE2084.

[4] T. K. F. Chiu, Q. Xia, X. Zhou, C. S. Chai, and M. Cheng, “Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of Artificial Intelligence in education,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 4, p. 100118, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118.

[5] S. Wang, F. Wang, Z. Zhu, J. Wang, T. Tran, and Z. Du, “Artificial Intelligence in education: A systematic literature review,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 252, p. 124167, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167.

[6] E. Kasneci et al., “ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 103, p. 102274, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

[7] H. Crompton and D. Burke, “Artificial Intelligence in higher education: the state of the field,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 22, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8.

[8] C. K. Lo, “What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 4, p. 410, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13040410.

[9] A. Tlili et al., “What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 15, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x.

[10] C. Redecker, European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017. doi: 10.2760/159770.

[11] UNESCO, UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers, Version 3. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2018.

[12] A. Cusi, F. Schacht, G. Aldon, and O. Swidan, “Assessment in mathematics: a study on teachers’ practices in times of pandemic,” ZDM – Math. Educ., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 221–233, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11858-022-01395-x.

[13] Y. Dai, “Negotiation of Epistemological Understandings and Teaching Practices Between Primary Teachers and Scientists about Artificial Intelligence in Professional Development,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 577–591, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11165-022-10072-8.

[14] I. Celik, M. Dindar, H. Muukkonen, and S. Järvelä, “The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: a Systematic Review of Research,” TechTrends, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 616–630, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y.

[15] A.-C. E. Ding, L. Shi, H. Yang, and I. Choi, “Enhancing teacher AI literacy and integration through different types of cases in teacher professional development,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 6, p. 100178, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100178.

[16] X. Tan, G. Cheng, and M. H. Ling, “Artificial Intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 8, p. 100355, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355.

[17] E. T. Stringer and A. Ortiz Aragón, Action Research, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2020.

[18] C. Beard, Experiential Learning Design: Theoretical Foundations and Effective Principles, 1st ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2022.

[19] I. Kusmaryono, D. Wijayanti, and H. R. Maharani, “Number of Response Options, Reliability, Validity, and Potential Bias in the Use of the Likert Scale Education and Social Science Research: A Literature Review,” Int. J. Educ. Methodol., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 625–637, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.12973/ijem.8.4.625.

[20] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2019.

[21] A. Saryoko, F. Aziz, I. Elyana, M. Rizky, and M. C. Junior, “PKM PENDAMPINGAN DIGITALISASI SEKOLAH SMPIT AJIMUTU GLOBAL INSANI TAMBUN UTARA-BEKASI BERBASIS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,” J. AbdiMas Nusa Mandiri, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 283–289, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.33480/abdimas.v7i2.7399.

[22] D. Mustofa, I. Darmayanti, A. Pramono, D. I. S. Saputra, V. S. Kusuma, and S. D. Apitiadi, “PELATIHAN LITERASI DIGITAL BAGI GURU SD N 1 TOYAREKA GUNA MENDUKUNG PEMBELAJARAN KURIKULUM MERDEKA,” J. AbdiMas Nusa Mandiri, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 115–121, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.33480/abdimas.v7i1.5949.

[23] J. Liu, D. Sun, J. Sun, J. Wang, and P. L. H. Yu, “Designing a generative AI enabled learning environment for mathematics word problem solving in primary schools: Learning performance, attitudes and interaction,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 9, p. 100438, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100438.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-28

How to Cite

[1]
“PENDAMPINGAN GURU DALAM PENGELOLAAN PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA BERBASIS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DENGAN PENDEKATAN ADMINISTRASI PENDIDIKAN MODERN ”, abdimas, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 613–620, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.33480/abdimas.v8i3.8476.