PELATIHAN PENYUSUNAN RUBRIK PENILAIAN PEMBELAJARAN KOLABORATIF DAN PARTISIPATIF PADA JURUSAN SOSIOLOGI UNIVERSITAS PALANGKA RAYA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33480/abdimas.v8i2.7811

Keywords:

assessment rubric, collaborative, participatory, rubric design, training

Abstract

The training on developing assessment rubrics for collaborative and participatory learning at the Department of Sociology, Universitas Palangka Raya, was conducted in response to the need to enhance the quality of project- and case-based learning evaluation. The program aimed to improve lecturers’ understanding and skills in designing authentic assessment rubrics aligned with 21st-century learning principles and Key Performance Indicator (KPI) 7 for higher education institutions. The community service activity employed a participatory training method conducted through four stages, namely needs identification, material development, rubric development training, and evaluation. A total of 15 lecturers participated in the training. Data were collected through participatory observation, evaluation questionnaires, and document analysis of the rubrics produced by participants. The results indicate an increase in the average understanding score from 58.4 to 82.7, reflecting a gain of 24.3 points. A total of 83% of participants achieved a score of ≥75 on the post-test, meeting the predefined success indicator. Twelve rubric drafts were produced, of which 83% met content validity criteria based on facilitator review. The satisfaction survey showed that 85% of participants were very satisfied with the training. Overall, the program effectively enhanced lecturers’ capacity to design measurable and contextual collaborative assessment tools that support the achievement of KPI 7. Follow-up training and mentoring are recommended to ensure sustainable implementation of the rubrics in classroom practice.

References

[1] J. Santos, A. S. Figueiredo, and M. Vieira, “Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review,” Nurse Educ Today, pp. 1–18, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003.

[2] J. Miranda, C. Navarrete, J. Noguez, and M. Ramírez-montoya, “The core components of education 4 0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education,” Computers and Electrical Engineering, vol. 93, no. June, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278.

[3] I. M. Narsa, N. Rosita, and N. Wulan, Panduan Metode Pembelajaran Kolaboratif dan Partisipatif. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2023.

[4] P. M. Silangen, A. M. Fitrianingrum, and F. L. S. Korompis, “Manajemen Pembelajaran Kolaboratif dan Partisipatif pada Mata Kuliah Termodinamika Patricia,” SCIENING: Science Learning Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 2023, doi: 10.53682/slj.v4i1.6495.

[5] Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Buku Panduan Indikator Kinerja Utama Perguruan Tinggi Negeri, no. 2. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2021.

[6] N. Ahmar, Z. Barus, R. Octaviani, Yamin, and L. Syamsumardian, “Pengembangan pembelajaran kolaboratif pancasila dan kewarganegaraan di perguruan tinggi,” Jurnal Aktualisasi Pancasila, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 2023.

[7] N. J. Rao, “Outcome-based Education: An Outline,” Higher Education for the Future, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5–21, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2347631119886418.

[8] K. Premalatha, “Course and Program Outcomes Assessment Methods in Outcome-Based Education: A Review,” Journal of Education, vol. 199, no. 3, pp. 111 –127, 2019, doi: 10.1177/002205741985.

[9] K. Husna, A. Mundiri, U. N. Jadid, and E. Java, “Improving Student Competence Through Learning Management Outcome Based Education,” Pedagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023, doi: 10.33650/pjp.v10i1.5516.

[10] S. Shaheen, “Theoretical Perspectives and Current Challenges of OBE Framework,” International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), vol. 1, no. December, pp. 122–129, 2019, doi: 10.14710/ijee.1.2.122-129.

[11] W. A. Marlina and S. Susiana, “The Effects of Case-Based Method, Project-Based Learning, and Experiential Method on Students ’ Analytical Ability in the Global Marketing Management Course,” in 4th International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2021) The, 2022, pp. 280–284, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220303.051.

[12] H. S. Falah and Jufrida, “Case Method in The Problem-Based Learning Model to Increase Student Participation in The Basic Physics Course,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 311–316, 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i1.6392.

[13] D. M. M. Sari and Y. Prasetyo, “Project-Based-Learning on Critical Reading Course to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills,” Studies in English Language and Education, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 442–456, 2021, doi: 10.24815/siele.v8i2.18407.

[14] K. P. Hastuti, N. F. Aristin, and A. I. M. Fani, “Improvement of Six Competency Skills through the Development of Flipped-Case Project in Era of Education 4.0,” Education Quarterly Reviews, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 125–135, 2022, doi: 10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.579.

[15] S. Wahjusaputri, “Project Based Learning on Creative Economy Competence at Voca- tional Schools in Bali,” Dinamika Pendidikan, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 173–181, 2021, doi: 10.15294/dp.v16i2.31544.

[16] C. A. Dewi, M. Erna, Martini, I. Haris, and I. N. Kundera, “The Effect of Contextual Collaborative Learning Based Ethnoscience to Increase Student’s Scientific Literacy Ability,” Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 525–541, 2021, doi: 10.36681/tused.2021.88.

[17] N. R. Dewi, I. Hartoyo, and C. H. Natalia, “Integrating the case method approach in 21 st century teaching: Empowering the development of effective and innovative teaching instruments,” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2024, 2024, doi: 10.33369/joall.v9i1.30061.

[18] C. Martinez, “Developing 21st century teaching skills: A case study of teaching and learning through project-based curriculum,” Cogent Education, vol. 9, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.2024936.

[19] Z. Chan and S. Ho, “Good and bad practices in rubrics: the perspectives of students and educators,” Assess Eval High Educ, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 533–545, May 2019, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1522528.

[20] R. E. Tractenberg, “The assessment evaluation rubric: Promoting learning and learner-centered teaching through assessment in face-to-face or distanced higher education,” Educ Sci (Basel), vol. 11, no. 8, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11080441.

[21] S. Hajar, “Strengthening Education Governance Management University in Penta Helix Perspective Towards the Era Society 5.0,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Political Science, and Humanities (ICoSPOLHUM 2021), 2022, pp. 281–289, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220302.042.

[22] M. T. Rahmadi et al., “Analisis Penerapan Case Method dan Team Based Project Dalam Kebijakan Jurusan di Universitas Negeri Medan,” Publikauma: Jurnal Administrasi Publik Universitas Medan Area, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 137–143, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.31289/publika.v10i2.8348.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-28

How to Cite

[1]
“PELATIHAN PENYUSUNAN RUBRIK PENILAIAN PEMBELAJARAN KOLABORATIF DAN PARTISIPATIF PADA JURUSAN SOSIOLOGI UNIVERSITAS PALANGKA RAYA”, abdimas, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 243–250, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.33480/abdimas.v8i2.7811.