HYBRID SAW-TOPSIS DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR EXEMPLARY RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS OFFICES SELECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v11i4.6881Keywords:
Decision Support System, Ministry of Religious Affairs, SAW, TOPSISAbstract
The selection of the Exemplary Religious Affairs Office (KUA) in Muaro Jambi Regency is currently hindered by manual, subjective assessments that lack transparency and objective benchmarking. This study addresses this gap by developing a web-based Decision Support System (DSS) that integrates Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Developed using the waterfall model, the system aims to enhance objectivity and efficiency in evaluating institutional performance. The primary scientific contribution lies in the proposed hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) architecture: SAW is utilized to establish transparent initial criteria weights, which are then processed through TOPSIS to resolve complex trade-offs by identifying the shortest distance to the positive ideal solution. Results indicate that this integrated framework significantly improves ranking consistency and provides a robust validation mechanism compared to traditional manual evaluations. Beyond its practical application, this study contributes to the theoretical discourse on hybrid MCDM integration, offering a validated framework for enhancing accountability and objective governance within public sector institutional evaluations.
Downloads
References
[1] Kementerian Agama, “Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 24 Tahun 2024 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kantor Urusan Agama,” https://cdn.kemenag.go.id/storage/archives/pma-no-24-tahun-2024-tentang-organisasi-dan-tata-kerja-kantor-urusan-agamapdf.pdf. [Online]. Available: https://cdn.kemenag.go.id/storage/archives/pma-no-24-tahun-2024-tentang-organisasi-dan-tata-kerja-kantor-urusan-agamapdf.pdf
[2] S. Hasanah, “Evaluasi Pelayanan Publik Di Kantor Urusan Agama (KUA) Melalui Sistem Informasi Manajemen Nikah,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40–53, 2024, doi: 10.24929/semnasfisip.v1i1.3190.
[3] B. Basri and E. Anom, “Communication Patterns of the Head of Religious Affairs Office (KUA) in Reducing the Divorce Rate,” Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65–73, 2023, doi: 10.52728/ijss.v4i1.640.
[4] T. Yusnita, A. Mardliyah, T. P. Nirwana, F. P. Muslikhah, E. Ernawati, and F. A. Quddus, “Persuasive Communication: Strategy by Office of Religious Affairs to Prevent Divorce,” Proc. Of the International Conference Multidisciplinary Res. Fo, vol. 1, pp. 591–596, 2024, doi: 10.31098/icmrsi.v1i.850.
[5] K. A. R. I, “Jumlah KUA Menurut Tipologi,” 2022, Kementerian Agama RI. [Online]. Available: https://satudata.kemenag.go.id/dataset/detail/jumlah-kua-menurut-tipologi
[6] Akh. Kheroni, “Manajemen Strategi Peningkatan Mutu Layanan Di Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan Ambal Kabupaten Kebumen,” An-Nidzam : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Studi Islam, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.33507/an-nidzam.v10i1.1130.
[7] F. Hak, T. Guimaraes, and M. Santos, “Towards effective clinical decision support systems: A systematic review,” Aug. 01, 2022, Public Library of Science. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272846.
[8] A. Alamanos, A. Rolston, and G. Papaioannou, “Development of a decision support system for sustainable environmental management and stakeholder engagement,” Hydrology, vol. 8, no. 1, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/HYDROLOGY8010040.
[9] H. Ryu et al., “A web-based decision support system (DSS) for hydrogen refueling station location and supply chain optimization,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 48, no. 93, pp. 36223–36239, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.064.
[10] G. Talari, E. Cummins, C. McNamara, and J. O’Brien, “State of the art review of Big Data and web-based Decision Support Systems (DSS) for food safety risk assessment with respect to climate change,” Aug. 01, 2022, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.08.032.
[11] J. Glass, R. Junghanns, R. Schlick, and C. Stefan, “The INOWAS platform: A web-based numerical groundwater modelling approach for groundwater management applications,” Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 155, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105452.
[12] Frieyadie, A. H. Sukmawati, and Nurajijah, “Combination of the SAW and TOPSIS Method for Determining the Best Marketplace Recommendations,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing Ltd, Nov. 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1641/1/012004.
[13] F. Ciardiello and A. Genovese, “A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 325, no. 2, pp. 967–994, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10479-023-05339-w.
[14] M. Cal and R. Sahin, “An Experimental Factor Analysis Study Using SAW and TOPSIS to Select and Rank Organic Agriculture Cities in Turkey,” International Journal on Food System Dynamics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 149–163, 2021, doi: 10.18461/ijfsd.v12i2.81.
[15] N. H. S. Harahap and A. Zahraini, “Laptop Selection Decision Support System According to Buyer Criteria With the Simple Additive Weighting Method,” Journal of Soft Computing Exploration, vol. 2, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.52465/joscex.v2i2.49.
[16] J. Kuswanto, “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting dan Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution dalam Pemilihan Dosen Pembimbing Skripsi,” Decode: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 725–736, 2024, doi: 10.51454/decode.v4i3.629.
[17] M. Tafrikan, A. K. Rachmawati, A. D. Ardiyanti, R. Saputri, and S. Umayah, “Penentuan E-Wallet Terbaik dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dan Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS),” Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2023, doi: 10.36499/jinrpl.v5i1.7718.
[18] S. S. Samsudin, Y. S. Pratomo, J. Pawiyatan Luhur, and B. D. Semarang, “Formulasi Diskresi Pada Penyelenggaraan Reformasi Birokrasi Di Kanwil Kementerian Agama Provinsi Jawa Tengah,” 2023.
[19] A. F. Toreh, “Reformasi Birokrasi dan Moderasi Beragama 2022,” Transformasi :Journal Of Management, Administration, Education, And Religious Affairs, vol. 4, pp. 389–412, 2022.
[20] N. Bin Saif, M. Almohawes, and S. M. Jamail, “The impact of user involvement in software development process,” Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 354–359, 2021, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v21.i1.pp.
[21] A. Saravanos and M. X. Curinga, “Simulating the Software Development Lifecycle: The Waterfall Model,” Applied System Innovation, vol. 6, no. 6, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3390/asi6060108.
[22] K. ’ Afiifah, Z. Fira Azzahra, and A. D. Anggoro, “Analisis Teknik Entity-Relationship Diagram dalam Perancangan Database: Sebuah Literature Review,” Jurnal Intech, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 18–22, 2022.
[23] B. Bajrami, V. Manevska, and K. Veljanovska, “A Multi-task Management System Based on PHP and MySQL,” in Proc. XIV Int. Conf. Applied Internet and Information Technologies (AIIT), Zrenjanin, Serbia, Nov. pp. 238–245, 2024.
[24] M. H. Koto, D. Z. Abidin, and Sharipuddin, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK SELEKSI KARYAWAN KONTRAK DI RS MITRA JAMBI MENGGUNAKAN METODE WASPAS,” Rabit : Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi Univrab, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 854–863, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.36341/RABIT.V10I2.6388.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhdi, Sharipuddin, Joni Devitra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
-a.jpg)
-b.jpg)
