ENHANCING ACCURACY OF WEATHER CLASSIFICATION USING DEEP FEATURES AND SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v11i4.8251Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Deep Features, MobileNet, Support Vector Machine, WeatherAbstract
Weather is a determinant of farmers' planting calendar. Farmers usually start planting rice in the rainy season because rice requires sufficient water to produce optimal harvests. The weather is almost unpredictable in certain months, so farmers now look at cloud conditions to predict the season. Seasonal predictions based on cloud imagery can be assisted using Artificial Intelligence methods. Previous research used deep learning via transfer learning, but the results were not optimal. This research dataset is sourced from Kaggle and consists of five classes, namely cloudy, foggy, rainy, shine, and sunrise with a total data of 1500 images. This research proposes that a hybrid deep features and machine learning approach be used to increase the accuracy of the results. The MobileNet deep learning method is used at the feature extraction stage, then for classification using the Support Vector Machine (SVM) method. Experimental results with the Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel on SVM produced an accuracy of 0.9500 for training data. The evaluation results using testing data produced an accuracy of 0.9667. This result also saw an increase of 4.2% in training data compared to previous research. Through these results, MobileNet-SVM is proven to be able to improve classification accuracy when using a small dataset with 1500 images.
Downloads
References
[1] J. Schmitt, F. Offermann, M. Söder, C. Frühauf, and R. Finger, “Extreme weather events cause significant crop yield losses at the farm level in German agriculture,” Food Policy, vol. 112, no. August, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102359.
[2] R. Ramadhan et al., “Trends in rainfall and hydrometeorological disasters in new capital city of Indonesia from long-term satellite-based precipitation products,” Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, vol. 28, p. 100827, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100827.
[3] A. Kolios, M. Richmond, S. Koukoura, and B. Yeter, “Effect of weather forecast uncertainty on offshore wind farm availability assessment,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 285, no. P1, p. 115265, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115265.
[4] A. Haleem, M. Javaid, M. Asim Qadri, R. Pratap Singh, and R. Suman, “Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for marketing: A literature-based study,” International Journal of Intelligent Networks, vol. 3, pp. 119–132, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin.2022.08.005.
[5] S. Joksimovic, D. Ifenthaler, R. Marrone, M. De Laat, and G. Siemens, “Opportunities of artificial intelligence for supporting complex problem-solving: Findings from a scoping review,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, p. 100138, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100138.
[6] G. F. Fitriana, A. B. Arifa, A. Prasetiadi, F. D. Adhinata, and N. G. Ramadhan, “Improving Accuracy of Cloud Images Using DenseNet-VGG19,” International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 688–693, 2023, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.13.2.18293.
[7] M. M. Taye, “Understanding of Machine Learning with Deep Learning: Architectures, Workflow, Applications and Future Directions,” Computers, vol. 12, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.3390/computers12050091.
[8] Y. Liu, H. Pu, and D. W. Sun, “Efficient extraction of deep image features using convolutional neural network (CNN) for applications in detecting and analysing complex food matrices,” Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 113, no. May, pp. 193–204, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.042.
[9] S. A. Salleh et al., “Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Object Based Classification in Earth Linear Features Extraction: A Comparison,” Revue Internationale de Géomatique, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 183–199, 2024, doi: 10.32604/rig.2024.050723.
[10] W. Rahmaniar and A. Hernawan, “Real-time human detection using deep learning on embedded platforms: A review,” Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC), vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 462-468Y, 2021, doi: 10.18196/jrc.26123.
[11] F. D. Adhinata, N. G. Ramadhan, A. Amrulloh, and A. R. Bahtiar, “Comparison of Supervised Learning Methods for COVID-19 Classification on Chest X-Ray Image,” CommIT Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 195–201, 2022, doi: 10.21512/commit.v16i2.7970.
[12] Y. Wu and G. Tao, “Application of a New Loss Function-Based Support Vector Machine Algorithm in Quality Control of Measurement Observation Data,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/7266719.
[13] V. Gupta, “Weather Classification,” Kaggle.com, 2020. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/vijaygiitk/multiclass-weather-dataset/ (accessed May 22, 2024).
[14] B. T. Felix and Suharjito, “Face Liveness Classification Using Mobilenet and Support Vector Machines,” ICIC Express Letters, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 779–786, 2022, doi: 10.24507/icicel.16.07.779.
[15] T. H. Tsai, Y. C. Ho, and P. T. Chi, “Hardware Architecture Design for Hand Gesture Recognition System on FPGA,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, no. June, pp. 51767–51776, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3277857.
[16] L. A. Latumakulita, F. J. Paat, Saroyo, I. Karim, I. N. G. A. Astawa, and H. Sirait, “Comparison of MobileNet and VGG16 CNN Architectures for Web-based Starfish Species Identification System,” Journal of Applied Data Sciences, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2117–2130, 2024, doi: 10.47738/jads.v5i4.456.
[17] R. Guido, S. Ferrisi, D. Lofaro, and D. Conforti, “An Overview on the Advancements of Support Vector Machine Models in Healthcare Applications: A Review,” Information (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.3390/info15040235.
[18] R. Krebs, S. S. Bagui, D. Mink, and S. C. Bagui, “Applying Multi-CLASS Support Vector Machines: One-vs.-One vs. One-vs.-All on the UWF-ZeekDataFall22 Dataset,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 19, 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13193916.
[19] Z. Sun, G. Wang, P. Li, H. Wang, M. Zhang, and X. Liang, “An improved random forest based on the classification accuracy and correlation measurement of decision trees,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 237, no. PB, p. 121549, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121549.
[20] D. Ghosh and J. Cabrera, “Enriched Random Forest for High Dimensional Genomic Data.,” IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 2817–2828, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2021.3089417.
[21] F. Mostafa, E. Hasan, M. Williamson, and H. Khan, “Statistical Machine Learning Approaches to Liver Disease Prediction,” Livers, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 294–312, 2021, doi: 10.3390/livers1040023.
[22] A. Kharwar and D. Thakor, “A random forest algorithm under the ensemble approach for feature selection and classification,” International Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 426–447, 2023, doi: 10.1504/IJCNDS.2023.131737.
[23] T. O. Omotehinwa, D. O. Oyewola, and E. G. Moung, “Optimizing the light gradient-boosting machine algorithm for an efficient early detection of coronary heart disease,” Informatics and Health, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 70–81, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.infoh.2024.06.001.
[24] Y. Liu and Z. Chen, “LightGBM-Based Human Action Recognition Using Sensors,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1–17, 2025, doi: 10.3390/s25123704.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Raden Sumiharto, Faisal Dharma Adhinata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
-a.jpg)
-b.jpg)
