ASSESSING USER EXPERIENCE OF SITURAWA GEDE TOURISM WEBSITE USING PSSUQ AND HEURISTIC

Authors

  • Anie Yoraeni Nusamandiri University image/svg+xml
  • Cep Adiwiharja Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Syifa Nur Rakhmah Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Sinta Rukiandari Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Sari Hartini Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v11i3.7332

Keywords:

Heuristic Evaluation, PSSUQ, Siturawagede, Usability, User Experience

Abstract

The Siturawagede platform is an information site built to support services, promotions, and interactions with the public. Therefore, the quality of the user experience (UX) is a crucial factor in ensuring the site's effective, efficient, and satisfying use. This study aims to analyze the user experience of the Siturawagede website, measure user satisfaction with ease of use, efficiency, and information quality using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ), assess the site's compliance with Nielsen's usability principles through a heuristic evaluation, and provide recommendations for improving the site's user-friendliness. The study involved 100 respondents who completed the PSSUQ questionnaire and three expert evaluators who conducted the heuristic assessment. The results showed that the average PSSUQ score of 2.6 was categorized as "good." This is based on the PSSUQ 1–7 scale, where a score closer to 1 indicates a positive experience (Strongly Agree) and a score closer to 7 indicates a negative experience (Strongly Disagree), indicating that users were quite satisfied with the system. The heuristic evaluation obtained a score of 1.49, identifying several minor navigation issues, but the system was generally good and needed only minor improvements. These findings provide guidance for improving the quality of the Siturawagede website to make it more informative and optimal in supporting tourism management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] N. R. Wiwesa, “User Interface Dan User Experience Untuk Mengelola Kepuasan Pelanggan,” J. Sos. Hum. Terap., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 17–31, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jsht/vol3/iss2/2

[2] G. Ilieva et al., “administrative sciences Factors Influencing User Perception and Adoption of E-Government Services,” 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030054.

[3] H. Hoang and T. Le Tan, “Unveiling digital transformation: Investigating technology adoption in Vietnam’s food delivery industry for enhanced customer experience,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 9, p. e19719, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19719.

[4] Chioma Susan Nwaimo, Ayodeji Enoch Adegbola, and Mayokun Daniel Adegbola, “Data-driven strategies for enhancing user engagement in digital platforms,” Int. J. Manag. Entrep. Res., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1854–1868, 2024, doi: 10.51594/ijmer.v6i6.1170.

[5] L. A. Sholaihah, R. Andrian, and U. P. Indonesia, “UI UX DESIGN : SENI KERAJINAN YANG MELIBATKAN PENGALAMAN,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 49–54, 2024.

[6] R. Munthe, A. Eko, and B. Waspada, “Usability Testing Over E-Tourism Information System to Measure Domestic Tourist Satisfaction In Balikpapan,” vol. 625, pp. 365–371, 2021.

[7] A. Aguirre, M. Lola, H. Sales, M. Youbi, J. Antonio, and L. Sánchez, “Web accessibility and inclusivity of tourist destinations at social media management . An intercultural analysis of Andalusia and Northern Morocco,” Univers. Access Inf. Soc., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 249–265, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10209-023-01020-y.

[8] C. Chang, “Taiwan ’ s E -Government Usability from Foreign Perspective and Website Accessibility amid COVID-19 Pandemic,” vol. 5, no. June 2021, pp. 16–41, doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/JOBBE.005.1.02.

[9] M. O. Grady and E. Mangina, “Usability considerations for open data portals,” Univers. Access Inf. Soc., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 2793–2803, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10209-025-01227-1.

[10] R. Suwandy, S. Hadini Marpaung, and Caroline, “Evaluasi Pengalaman Pengguna dengan Menggunakan Post Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) Perpustakaan Digital Universitas Mikroskil,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 6, pp. 4190–4206, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.mikroskil.ac.id/pustaka.

[11] T. S. Alsalem and M. A. Alshamari, “Assessing Interactive Web-Based Systems Using Behavioral Measurement Techniques,” vol. 15, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15110365.

[12] R. R. Aditama and I. G. L. P. E. Prismana, “Penggunaan Metode Heuristic evaluation sebagai Analisis Usability dan Redesign Antarmuka pada Aplikasi JConnect Mobile Bank Jatim,” JEISBI (Journal Emerg. Inf. Syst. Bus. Intell., vol. 04, no. 04, pp. 101–110, 2023.

[13] R. Listiya, “Analisis Kinerja Web Disdukcapil Dengan Menggunakan Heuristic Evaluation Dan Webuse Web Performance Analysis with Heuristic Evaluation and Webuse,” J. Digit. Lit. Volunt., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2023, doi: 10.57119/litdig.v2i1.42.

[14] R. Harsono, Hargianti Dini Iswandarir, “Evaluation Of User Interface Implementation Of Sayang Anak Application Based On,” Ilmu, J. Kesehatan, Teknol., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 2025.

[15] R. Mayasari, U. S. Karawang, N. Heryana, and U. S. Karawang, Konsep dan Teori Perangkat Lunak, no. February. 2024.

[16] P. Vlachogianni and N. Tselios, “Perceived Usability Evaluation of Educational Technology Using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ): A Systematic Review,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 17, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151712954.

[17] L. Hasan, “Common Usability Problems on Educational Websites,” vol. 16, pp. 22–27, 2022, doi: 10.46300/9107.2022.16.5.

[18] S. Sidikti, “Usability Analysis of Higher Education Information,” vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 22–25, 2022.

[19] U. U. Sufandi and D. A. Aprijani, “Pengukuran Usability Aplikasi Web Menggunakan Metode Pssuq (Study Kasus: Aplikasi Sitta Universitas Terbuka),” JST (Jurnal Sains dan Teknol., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 249–256, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jstundiksha.v11i2.43534.

[20] Y. S. Phang, C. Heaukulani, W. Martanto, R. Morris, M. Mian Tong, and R. Ho, “Perceptions of a Digital Mental Health Platform Among Participants With Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Other Clinically Diagnosed Mental Disorders in Singapore: Usability and Acceptability Study,” JMIR Hum. Factors, vol. 10, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.2196/42167.

[21] S. Valizadeh-haghi, S. Rahmatizadeh, M. M. Forouzanfar, Z. Kohzadi, and F. Fatehi, “Frontiers in Health Informatics Usability evaluation of emergency department information system : A case of discharge and admission sections of an educational hospital,” pp. 2–7, 2023, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/fhi.v12i0.538.

[22] J. C. Nunnally and I. H. Bernstein, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY, 3rd ed., vol. 1. New: McGRAW-HILL, INC.

[23] E. T. Bantug, R. G. Luciano, and R. V Bauat, “Heuristic Usability Evaluation : A Case Study of Online Enrolment System of a State University,” vol. 6495, no. 6, pp. 360–365, 2021, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.86.44.

[24] A. Ali, M. U. Harun, A. Rasyid, and I. Syarif, “Measurement of Problem Difficulty Level in User Interface Medical Management System ( MMS ) Application with Heuristic Evaluation Approach at Surabaya Medical Services Hospital,” pp. 587–594, 2023, doi: 10.5220/0010949500003260.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-20

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2026): JITK Issue February 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Anie Yoraeni, Cep Adiwiharja, Syifa Nur Rakhmah, Sinta Rukiandari, Sari Hartini

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
“ASSESSING USER EXPERIENCE OF SITURAWA GEDE TOURISM WEBSITE USING PSSUQ AND HEURISTIC”, jitk, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 874–881, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.33480/jitk.v11i3.7332.