COMPARISON OF MCDM METHOD FOR SELECT ORPHANAGE

  • Dwi Marisa Midyanti (1*) Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Rahmi Hidayati (2) Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Syamsul Bahri (3) Universitas Tanjungpura

  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: ARAS Method, CoCoSo Method, VIKOR Method, MCDM Method, Pemilihan Panti Asuhan

Abstract

Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is a decision-making method that has various techniques for solving the problem of determining the best alternative. In this study, three methods will be compared, namely CoCoSo, ARAS, and VIKOR, for the selection of Orphanages, which are the priority recipients of APBD funds. Determination of orphanage recipients from APBD funds in the Pontianak City Social Service  still does manually, by only comparing the facilities and conditions of the orphanage. The CoCoSo, ARAS, and VIKOR methods can provide recommendations in the form of the rating of orphanages that can be used as a reference to determine the priorities of APBD fund recipients. The ranking produced by each method will be compared and seen the correlation coefficient value using the Spearman rank correlation. The results of this study are the three methods provide different rankings, the Spearman correlation coefficient values are very weak and weak, and there is no significant relationship between one method with other methods.

Author Biographies

Rahmi Hidayati, Universitas Tanjungpura

Program studi Rekayasa Sistem Komputer

Syamsul Bahri, Universitas Tanjungpura

Program Studi Rekayasa Sistem Komputer

References

S. Kusumadewi, S. Hartati, A. Harjoko, and R. Wardoyo, Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2006.

D. Stanujkic, B. Đorđević, and M. Đorđević, “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SOME PROMINENT MCDM METHODS : A CASE OF RANKING SERBIAN BANKS,” Serbian J. Manag., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 213–241, 2013.

S. H. Zolfani, E. K. Zavadskas, and P. Khazaelpour, “The Multi-Aspect Criterion in the PMADM Outline and Its Possible Application to Sustainability Assessment,” Sustainability, vol. 10, p. 4451, 2018.

M. Yazdani, P. Zarate, E. K. Zavadskas, and Z. Turskis, “A combined compromise solution ( CoCoSo ) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems Article information :,” Manag. Decis., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2501–2519, 2018.

E. K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, “A new additive ratio assessment ( ARAS ) method in multicriteria decision ‐ making,” Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 159–172, 2010.

R. Autia, “Implementasi Metode VIKOR Untuk Rekomendasi Panti Asuhan Penerima Dana APBD Berbasis Website (Studi Kasus: Dinas Sosial Kota Pontianak),” Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak, 2019.

S. Opricovic, Visekriterijumska optimizacija u gradevinarstvu - Multi-criteria optimization of civil engineering systems. 1998.

R. Kurniawan and B. Yuniarto, Analisa Regresi Dasar dan Penerapannya dengan R. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.

Published
2020-08-01
How to Cite
Midyanti, D., Hidayati, R., & Bahri, S. (2020). COMPARISON OF MCDM METHOD FOR SELECT ORPHANAGE. JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Teknologi Komputer), 6(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v6i1.1391
Article Metrics

Abstract viewed = 8 times
PDF downloaded = 4 times