KOMPARASI ALGORITMA DENGAN PENDEKATAN RANDOM UNDERSAMPLING UNTUK MENANGANI KETIDAKSEIMBANGAN KELAS PADA PREDIKSI CACAT SOFTWARE
Keywords:
Naive Bayes, J48, Random Forest, Random Undersampling, Prediksi Cacat Software.
Abstract
Testing is a process that becomes a standard in producing quality software. In predictions of software defects, prediction errors are very bad. Incorrect and inappropriate data sets result in inaccurate prediction results will be affect the software itself. This study aims to overcome the problem of class imbalance with the software defect prediction data set, through the Random Undersampling (RUS) data level approach by taking several algorithms namely Naive Bayes (NB), J48 and Random Forest (RF) which aims to compare the accuracy level highest so that maximum results are obtained in the process of predicting software defects. From the results of this study it can be found that to overcome class imbalances using the Random Undersampling level data approach to predict software defects, the highest level of accuracy is obtained by the Random Forest algorithm with an accuracy rate of 71.932%.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Akbar, M. S., & Rochimah, S. (2017). Prediksi Cacat Perangkat Lunak Dengan Optimasi Naive Bayes Menggunakan Gain Ratio. Jurnal Sistem Dan Informatika, 11, 147–155.
Andri, Kunang, Y. N., & Murniati, S. (2013). Implementasi Teknik Data Mining Untuk Memprediksi Tingkat Kelulusan Mahasiswa pada Universitas Bina Darma Palembang, 2013(June 2016), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4212.1845
Aries, S., & Wahono, R. S. (2015). Pendekatan Level Data untuk Menangani Ketidakseimbangan Kelas pada Prediksi Cacat Software. Journal of Software Engineering, 1(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1896-1126(14)00030-3
Diwandari, S., & Setiawan, N. A. (2015). Perbandingan Algoritme J48 dan Nbtree Untuk Klasifikasi Diagnosa Penyakit Pada Soybean. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 2015(Sentika), 205–212.
Frank, E., Hall, M., Trigg, L., Holmes, G., & Witten, I. H. (2004). Data Mining in Bioinformatics using Weka. Bioinformatics, 20(15), 2479–2481. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth261
Frastian, N., Hendrian, S., & Valentino, V. H. (2018). Komparasi Algoritma Klasifikasi Menentukan Kelulusan Mata Kuliah Pada Universitas. Faktor Exacta, 11(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.30998/faktorexacta.v11i1.1826
Okutan, A., & Yildiz, O. T. (2014). Software Defect Prediction using Bayesian Networks. Empirical Software Engineering, 19(1), 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-012-9218-8
PROMISE. (2010). Data sets for software defect prediction. Retrieved from http://tunedit.org/repo/PROMISE/DefectPrediction
Putra, D. S., Wibawa, A. D., & Purnomo, M. H. (2016). Berjalan Menggunakan Random Forest, 1(1), 51–56.
Putri, S. A., & Frieyadie. (2017). Combining Integreted Sampling Technique With Feature Selection For Software Defect Prediction. In 2017 5th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) (pp. 1–6). Bali: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM.2017.8089264
Shuo Wang, & Xin Yao. (2013). Using Class Imbalance Learning for Software Defect Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 62(2), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2013.2259203
Siringoringo, R. (2017). Integrasi Metode Resampling dan K-Nearest Naighbor pada Prediksi Cacat Software Aplikasi Android. ISD, 2 No.1(1), 47–58.
Tharwat, A. (2018). Classification assessment methods. Applied Computing and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003
Andri, Kunang, Y. N., & Murniati, S. (2013). Implementasi Teknik Data Mining Untuk Memprediksi Tingkat Kelulusan Mahasiswa pada Universitas Bina Darma Palembang, 2013(June 2016), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4212.1845
Aries, S., & Wahono, R. S. (2015). Pendekatan Level Data untuk Menangani Ketidakseimbangan Kelas pada Prediksi Cacat Software. Journal of Software Engineering, 1(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1896-1126(14)00030-3
Diwandari, S., & Setiawan, N. A. (2015). Perbandingan Algoritme J48 dan Nbtree Untuk Klasifikasi Diagnosa Penyakit Pada Soybean. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 2015(Sentika), 205–212.
Frank, E., Hall, M., Trigg, L., Holmes, G., & Witten, I. H. (2004). Data Mining in Bioinformatics using Weka. Bioinformatics, 20(15), 2479–2481. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth261
Frastian, N., Hendrian, S., & Valentino, V. H. (2018). Komparasi Algoritma Klasifikasi Menentukan Kelulusan Mata Kuliah Pada Universitas. Faktor Exacta, 11(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.30998/faktorexacta.v11i1.1826
Okutan, A., & Yildiz, O. T. (2014). Software Defect Prediction using Bayesian Networks. Empirical Software Engineering, 19(1), 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-012-9218-8
PROMISE. (2010). Data sets for software defect prediction. Retrieved from http://tunedit.org/repo/PROMISE/DefectPrediction
Putra, D. S., Wibawa, A. D., & Purnomo, M. H. (2016). Berjalan Menggunakan Random Forest, 1(1), 51–56.
Putri, S. A., & Frieyadie. (2017). Combining Integreted Sampling Technique With Feature Selection For Software Defect Prediction. In 2017 5th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) (pp. 1–6). Bali: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM.2017.8089264
Shuo Wang, & Xin Yao. (2013). Using Class Imbalance Learning for Software Defect Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 62(2), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2013.2259203
Siringoringo, R. (2017). Integrasi Metode Resampling dan K-Nearest Naighbor pada Prediksi Cacat Software Aplikasi Android. ISD, 2 No.1(1), 47–58.
Tharwat, A. (2018). Classification assessment methods. Applied Computing and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003
Published
2019-03-07
How to Cite
Ginabila, G., & Fauzi, A. (2019). KOMPARASI ALGORITMA DENGAN PENDEKATAN RANDOM UNDERSAMPLING UNTUK MENANGANI KETIDAKSEIMBANGAN KELAS PADA PREDIKSI CACAT SOFTWARE. Jurnal Pilar Nusa Mandiri, 15(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.33480/pilar.v15i1.28
Article Metrics
Abstract viewed = 160 times
PDF downloaded = 205 times
Abstract viewed = 160 times
PDF downloaded = 205 times
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2019 Ginabila & Settings Ahamd Fauzi
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to the PILAR Nusa Mandiri journal as the publisher of the journal, and the author also holds the copyright without restriction.
Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations. The reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in databases, and its transmission by any form or media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopies, recordings, magnetic media, etc. , are allowed with written permission from the PILAR Nusa Mandiri journal.
PILAR Nusa Mandiri journal, the Editors and the Advisory International Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions, or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the PILAR Nusa Mandiri journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
