COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF USABILITY LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN POLITEKNIK LAMANDAU
Abstract
Learning Management System (LMS) is a tool that functions to help online class management, and has become a necessity in the learning process of higher education. Politeknik Lamandau especially in the field of Computer Engineering Technology as a developing tertiary institution has used several LMS including, Edmodo, Schoology, and Google Classroom. In its application, not all users understand the operation well due to usability issues such as complicated appearance, functions menu layout that is not user friendly, speed processing issue, the difficulty of memorizing menu functions, errors in operation that will affect user satisfaction. In this study uses the method a system usability scale test was conducted to measure the usability of the system with five components, like satisfaction, errors, efficiency, learnability, and memorability. The purpose of this study is to determine the LMS usability evaluation based on user responses. The results of the study carried out is term of usability, LMS Edmodo is categorized as acceptable with score 70 while Google Classroom and Schoology are categorized almost acceptable with score 67,6 and 64,4
Downloads
References
M. F. Tretinjak, “Moving Teaching From Blackboard to The Learning Management System - Helping Absent Students Learn From Home,” MIPRO, no. May, pp. 500–502, 2018.
B. Bervell and V. Arkorful, “LMS-enabled blended learning utilization in distance tertiary education: establishing the relationships among facilitating conditions, voluntariness of use and use behaviour,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-0183-9.
A. Krouska, C. Troussas, and M. Virvou, “Comparing LMS and CMS platforms supporting social e-learning in higher education,” 2017 8th Int. Conf. Information, Intell. Syst. Appl. IISA 2017, vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: 10.1109/IISA.2017.8316408.
W. N. T. W. Hussin, J. Harun, and N. A. Shukor, “Online Tools for Collaborative Learning to Enhance Students Interaction,” 2019 7th Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. ICoICT 2019, pp. 3–7, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICoICT.2019.8835197.
R. Sabharwal, M. R. Hossain, R. Chugh, and M. Wells, “Learning Management Systems in the Workplace: A Literature Review,” Proc. 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. Teaching, Assessment, Learn. Eng. TALE 2018, no. December, pp. 387–393, 2019, doi: 10.1109/TALE.2018.8615158.
J. Nielsen, “Usability 101: Introduction to Usability, Human Computer Interaction,” Nielsen Norman Group, 2012. .
R. S. Pradini, R. Kriswibowo, and F. Ramdani, “Usability Evaluation on the SIPR Website Uses the System Usability Scale and Net Promoter Score,” Proc. 2019 4th Int. Conf. Sustain. Inf. Eng. Technol. SIET 2019, pp. 280–284, 2019, doi: 10.1109/SIET48054.2019.8986098.
W. Eka and Y. Retnani, “Usability Testing to Evaluate the Library ’ s Academic Web Site,” pp. 3–6.
R. Adila, D. H. Syaifullah, and A. I. Hazmy, “Evaluasi Usability pada Learning Management System Berbasis Smartphone,” J. Ergon. dan K3, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2018, doi: 10.5614/j.ergo.2018.3.2.1.
K. Al-Omar, “Evaluating the Usability and Learnability of the ‘Blackboard’ LMS Using SUS and Data Mining,” Proc. Second Int. Conf. Comput. Methodol. Commun. (ICCMC, no. Iccmc, pp. 386–390, 2018, doi: 10.1109/iccmc.2018.8488038.
Z. Zainuddin, H. Habiburrahim, and H. D. Hermawan, “Designing a Technology-Enhanced Flipped Learning Model Using Schoology LMS,” Proceeding - 2018 Int. Semin. Intell. Technol. Its Appl. ISITIA 2018, pp. 245–250, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ISITIA.2018.8710778.
Y. Tjong, L. Sugandi, A. Nurshafita, Y. Magdalena, C. Evelyn, and N. S. Yosieto, “User Satisfaction Factors on Learning Management Systems Usage,” Proc. 2018 Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Technol. ICIMTech 2018, no. September, pp. 11–14, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICIMTech.2018.8528171.
Abstract viewed = 351 times
PDF downloaded = 233 times
-a.jpg)
-b.jpg)
