E-GOVERNMENT MATURITY ANALYSIS USING THE LAYNE AND LEE, HILLER AND BELANGER, AND SPBE MODELS

  • Eltyasar Putrajati Noman Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7789-5120
  • Andi Wahju Rahardjo Emanuel Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
Keywords: e-government, Hiller and Belanger's model, Layne and Lee's model, maturity model, SPBE

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the level of e-government maturity in Kupang City using the Layne and Lee and Hiller and Belanger models and combine them with the SPBE model to provide a more comprehensive approach. The method used to develop an audit model involves a literature study to understand the e-government maturity model, identification of specific objectives for analysis of the Kupang City Population and Civil Registration Service (DUKCAPIL) website, determination of scope based on the SPBE model, determination of design audit criteria and benchmarks, collection and data synthesis from the Kupang City DUKCAPIL e-Government site, as well as analysis of audit findings, and using the GT Metrix tool for performance analysis and evaluation of the Kupang City DUKCAPIL website. The research results show that the lowest rating is F out of six, which indicates poor service performance. The Layne and Lee Model assessment gives a score of 18, indicating the technology's lack of integration and complexity. Hiller and Belanger's Model assessment gives a value of 13, indicating an immature level. These findings highlight significant gaps between the models evaluated. Recommendations based on research are to increase citizen participation by improving the Kupang City DUKCAPIL website based on a maturity model and the need for regular audits and ongoing evaluations to improve public services in Kupang City in e-government maturity. In conclusion, this research provides a new contribution to the field of e-government by highlighting the need for audits using several e-government maturity models to improve public services in Kupang City.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. Lindgren, C. Ø. Madsen, S. Hofmann, and U. Melin, “Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 427–436, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.002.

B. Tjahjono, M. Ardiansyah, ; Gerry Firmansyah, and H. Akbar, “Risk Management Of Information System In Diskominfo Statistic And Encoding Using NIST SP 800-30,” JITK (Jurnal Imu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komputer), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 134–142, 2023, doi: 10.33480/jitk.v9i1.4080.access.

S. ElMassah and M. Mohieldin, “Digital transformation and localizing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),” Ecological Economics, vol. 169, no. August 2019, p. 106490, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106490.

S. Lee-Geiller and T. (David) Lee, “Using government websites to enhance democratic E-governance: A conceptual model for evaluation,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 208–225, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.003.

Z. Liu, L. Ren, R. Li, Q. Liu, and Y. Zhao, “ID-based sanitizable signature data integrity auditing scheme with privacy-preserving,” Comput Secur, vol. 121, p. 102858, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2022.102858.

R. K. Wijanarko, “Si/It Strategic Planning Using Ward and Peppard Methods (Case Study: Pt. Xy),” JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komputer), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 40–45, 2022, doi: 10.33480/jitk.v8i1.2979.

S. C. Mwangi, “A survey of civic engagement tools and capabilities of city and county government web sites,” Online J Commun Media Technol, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.30935/OJCMT/11255.

F. Iannacci, A. P. Seepma, C. de Blok, and A. Resca, “Reappraising maturity models in e-Government research: The trajectory-turning point theory,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 310–329, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.02.001.

K. A. Bakar, K. Abu Bakar, R. Ibrahim, and Y. Yunus, “Digital Government Evolution and Maturity Models: A Review,” Open International Journal of Informatics (OIJI, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 70, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362467584

I Made Sukarsa et al., “Evaluation of E-Government Maturity Models in Sub-District Public Services in Indonesia Using the SPBE Framework,” Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 243–253, 2020, doi: 10.29207/resti.v4i2.1825.

T. Ramadhane, “Public Value Based E-Government Maturity Model: a Literature Review,” JIKO (Jurnal Informatika dan Komputer), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 62–71, 2023, doi: 10.33387/jiko.v6i1.5898.

R. Yuliana and Z. A. Hasibuan, “Best practice framework for information technology security governance in Indonesian government,” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 6522–6534, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v12i6.pp6522-6534.

K. Anwar, T. Handoko, M. Rafi, and R. Lestari, “How Big Data Contributes to Government Public Service Innovation in Indonesia?,” Res Militaris, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 608–617, 2022.

E. P. Noman and M. Kamisutara, “Design and Build Applications for Maternal and Child Health Promotion and Services to Overcome Stunting in NTT Province,” International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 05, 2022.

P. T. D. Fanggidae and U. Madjid, “Effective Data And Information Governance In Local Government Environment (Study in Kupang City),” Jurnal Scientia, vol. 12, no. 03, pp. 2788–2805, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://seaninstitute.org/infor/index.php/pendidikan/article/view/1630%0Ahttp://seaninstitute.org/infor/index.php/pendidikan/article/download/1630/1319

M. M. Nielsen, The Demise of eGovernment Maturity Models: Framework and Case Studies. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Morten-Meyerhoff-Nielsen-2/publication/342216365_The_Demise_of_eGovernment_Maturity_Models_Framework_and_Case_Studies/links/5ee93ab7299bf1faac5c6e84/The-Demise-of-eGovernment-Maturity-Models-Framework-and-Case-Studies.

I. G. T. Suryawan, I. G. A. A. A. Satyawati, I. W. A. Purnama, and I. M. D. P. Arsana, “Evaluasi Dan Redesign Website Menggunakan System Usability Scale Dan Automated Software Testing,” JST (Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 18–28, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jstundiksha.v11i1.40785.

I. B. Suban and A. W. R. Emanuel, “Peran Framework ITIL V3 Mengukur Kualitas Layanan TI (Studi Kasus : Perpustakaan UAJY),” Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 59–63, 2020, doi: 10.30591/jpit.v5i2.1844.

S. R. Chohan, G. Hu, W. Si, and A. T. Pasha, “Synthesizing e-government maturity model: a public value paradigm towards digital Pakistan,” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 495–522, 2020, doi: 10.1108/TG-11-2019-0110.

N. A. Wessiani, P. Suwignjo, A. A. Pratiwi, and T. W. Pramesti, “Development of a maturity model based on the input, process, and output aspects of e-government,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, pp. 2414–2425, 2021, doi: 10.46254/an11.20210459.

Y. Payong, “Evaluation of the Maturity Level of IT Governance for Public Information Services and Public Complaints at the Kupang City Government using COBIT 4.0,” Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 35–54, 2020, doi: 10.37182/jik.v5i2.56.

M. Iqbal and U. Pribadi, “Level of E-Report Utilization in Special Region of Yogyakarta: Layne and Lee Model Perspective,” Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.journal.nu.ac.th/JCDR/article/view/Vol-14-No-1-2021-37-45

P. Bhagawati, “E-Governance : A study of North East India,” pp. 3188–3197, 2020.

R. Lamboglia, D. Lavorato, E. Scornavacca, and S. Za, “Exploring the relationship between audit and technology. A bibliometric analysis,” Meditari Accountancy Research, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1233–1260, 2020, doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-03-2020-0836.

S. R. Khademi and S. M. Khademi, “Investigating electronic government maturity models | Investigación de modelos de madurez de gobierno electrónico,” Sociologia y Tecnociencia, vol. 11, no. EXTRA 1, pp. 160–176, 2021.

V. E. Tuhana, L. L. Daga, and I. G. A. R. Pietriani, “Pemanfaatan Website Kota Kupang Sebagai Online Public Relations,” Jurnal Communio : Jurnal Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 206–219, 2022, doi: 10.35508/jikom.v11i2.6145.

Elen Lian, Megandaru Widhi Kawuryan, and Yudi Rusfiana, “Kualitas Layanan Online Berbasis Whatsapp dalam Pelayanan Administrasi Kependudukan,” Public Service and Governance Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–43, 2023, doi: 10.56444/psgj.v4i1.752.

L. Duma, “PEMPROV NTT RAIH PERINGKAT KE-5 NASIONAL KATEGORI DAERAH TK. I PENYELENGGARAAN SPBE TAHUN 2022,” DISKOMINFO Provinsi NTT. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://diskominfo.nttprov.go.id/2023/02/25/pemprov-ntt-raih-peringkat-ke-5-nasional-kategori-daerah-tk-i-penyelenggaraan-spbe-tahun-2022/#:~:text=Pada pencapaian indeks SPBE Tahun,predikat Baik di Tahun 2022.

K. Layne and J. Lee, “Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 122–136, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1.

P. Bhagawati, “E-Governance Maturity and Indian States: a Case Study,” International Journal of Management (IJM), vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1014–1020, 2020, doi: 10.34218/IJM.11.11.2020.093.

B. Noveriyanto, L. C. Nisa, A. S. Bahtiar, S. Sahri, and I. Irwansyah, “E-GOVERNMENT SEBAGAI LAYANAN KOMUNIKASI PEMERINTAH KOTA SURABAYA (Studi Kematangan e-government Sebagai Layanan Komunikasi Government to Government, Government to Citizen, Government to Business),” Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 37, 2018, doi: 10.14421/pjk.v11i1.1371.

Published
2024-02-28
How to Cite
[1]
E. Noman and A. Emanuel, “E-GOVERNMENT MATURITY ANALYSIS USING THE LAYNE AND LEE, HILLER AND BELANGER, AND SPBE MODELS”, jitk, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 284-291, Feb. 2024.