OPTIMIZATION OF LIVESTOCK MONITORING SYSTEM IN OUTDOOR BASED ON INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT)

  • Andi Chairunnas Universitas Pakuan
  • Agung Prahujana Putra Universitas Pakuan
Keywords: Animal health, animal health monitoring, heart rate sensors, IOT, livestock farming, location tracking, real-time

Abstract

Livestock businesses are often underestimated by the public because they are associated with less hygienic working environments. However, the demand for livestock products such as meat and milk is increasing, providing significant business opportunities. Several obstacles, such as livestock loss and the capital required for cage construction, are barriers to starting a livestock business. Livestock losses, especially in outdoor farms, often occur because of the lack of proper monitoring and data collection. Therefore, technology is required to overcome this problem. The application of IoT technology is an effective solution for overcoming this problem. By utilizing sensors, such as GPS, temperature, and heart rate, farmers can monitor farm animals remotely using Android applications. In this study, a U-blox Neo6m GPS sensor was used to track the location of farm animals, a temperature sensor was used to monitor the temperature conditions of farm animals, and a heart rate sensor was used to determine the health of farm animals that had been tested. The use of a 1500 mAh LI-ION LITHIUM battery as a power source proved to be sufficient for 7 h. The results showed that this IoT-based Outdoor Livestock Monitoring System can provide information on the last location of livestock as well as real-time heart rate and temperature data in the database. This innovation opens opportunities for farmers to improve livestock management and monitoring efficiently, minimize losses, and increase the productivity of their livestock business

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. Subandi, H. Hermawan, and A. S. Aryani, “Value Chain Analysis Indonesian Animal Husbandry Industry,” J. Appl. Sci. Adv. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/JASAT/article/view/4688

W. Tang, A. Biglari, R. Ebarb, T. Pickett, S. Smallidge, and M. Ward, “A smart sensing system of water quality and intake monitoring for livestock and wild animals,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 7–10, 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21082885.

H. Karuniawati, M. A. A. Hassali, W. I. Ismail, T. Taufik, and S. Suryawati, “Antibiotic use in animal husbandry: A mixed-methods study among general community in Boyolali, Indonesia,” Int. J. One Heal., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 122–127, 2021, doi: 10.14202/IJOH.2021.122-127.

U. Riaz, M. Idris, M. Ahmed, F. Ali, and L. Yang, “Infrared Thermography as a Potential Non-Invasive Tool for Estrus Detection in Cattle and Buffaloes,” Animals, vol. 13, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ani13081425.

C. Trilaksana, E. Akbartama, A. Muttaqin, and O. Setyawati, “Internet of Things-based Cow Body Weight Recording System,” J. EECCIS (Electrics, Electron. Commun. Control. Informatics, Syst., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 8–12, 2023, doi: 10.21776/jeeccis.v17i1.1632.

F. Fonseca and J. Fuentes, “Editorial: Microbiome dynamics as biomarkers of welfare status in aquatic species,” Front. Physiol., vol. 14, no. August, pp. 1–2, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1276351.

D. Mancuso, G. Castagnolo, and S. M. C. Porto, “Cow Behavioural Activities in Extensive Farms: Challenges of Adopting Automatic Monitoring Systems,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23083828.

V. M. T. Aleluia, V. N. G. J. Soares, J. M. L. P. Caldeira, and P. D. Gaspar, “Livestock Monitoring Prototype Implementation and Validation,” Rev. Inform. Teor. e Apl., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 53–65, 2023, doi: 10.22456/2175-2745.127207.

W. J. R. Rolim, P. J. Spencer, and D. A. De Andrade, “Development of an arduino based real time environmental monitor for animal facilities,” Cuad. Educ. y Desarro., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 2913–2931, 2023, doi: 10.55905/cuadv15n3-049.

G. Berthelot, S. Saïd, and V. Bansaye, “A random walk model that accounts for space occupation and movements of a large herbivore,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93387-2.

K. El Moutaouakil, H. Jdi, B. Jabir, and N. Falih, “Digital Farming: A Survey on IoT-based Cattle Monitoring Systems and Dashboards,” Agris On-line Pap. Econ. Informatics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 31–39, 2023, doi: 10.7160/aol.2023.150203.

J. G. Rajendran, M. Alagarsamy, V. Seva, P. M. Dinesh, B. Rajangam, and K. Suriyan, “IoT based tracking cattle healthmonitoring system using wireless sensors,” Bull. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 3086–3094, 2023, doi: 10.11591/eei.v12i5.4610.

S. Y. Cottee and P. Petersan, “Animal Welfare and Organic Aquaculture in Open Systems,” J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 501–502, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10806-009-9195-0.

S. J. Schneidewind, M. R. Al Merestani, S. Schmidt, T. Schmidt, C. Thöne-Reineke, and M. Wiegard, “Rumination Detection in Sheep: A Systematic Review of Sensor-Based Approaches,” Animals, vol. 13, no. 24, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ani13243756.

K. Rakić, “Internet of Things in Education: Opportunities and Challenges,” Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 1827 CCIS, pp. 104–117, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36833-2_8.

Y. Dong et al., “PigSense: Structural Vibration-based Activity and Health Monitoring System for Pigs,” ACM Trans. Sens. Networks, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–43, 2024, doi: 10.1145/3604806.

S. Hempel, H. Vu, T. Amon, and D. Janke, “The Influence of pH Dynamics on Modeled Ammonia Emission Patterns of a Naturally Ventilated Dairy Cattle Building,” Atmosphere (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1–23, 2023, doi: 10.3390/atmos14101534.

L. Fonseca, D. Corujo, W. Xavier, and P. Gonçalves, “On the Development of a Wearable Animal Monitor,” Animals, vol. 13, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ani13010120.

S. Hempel, H. Vu, T. Amon, and D. Janke, “The Influence of pH Dynamics on Modeled Ammonia Emission Patterns of a Naturally Ventilated Dairy Cattle Building,” Atmosphere, vol. 14, no. 10. 2023. doi: 10.3390/atmos14101534.

P. Gonçalves and D. Corujo, “SpaceSheep: Satellite Communications for Ovine Smart Grazing,” Vet. Sci., vol. 10, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.3390/vetsci10050340.

K. Rafiq et al., “WildWID: An open-source active RFID system for wildlife research,” Methods Ecol. Evol., vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1580–1587, 2021, doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13651.

Published
2024-02-29
How to Cite
[1]
A. Chairunnas and A. Putra, “OPTIMIZATION OF LIVESTOCK MONITORING SYSTEM IN OUTDOOR BASED ON INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT)”, jitk, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 323 - 329, Feb. 2024.