USABILITY EVALUATION OF MOBILE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION BASED ON FACE AUTHENTICATION, GEOLOCATION AND QR CODE

  • I Kadek Dendy Senapartha Duta Wacana Christian University
  • Matahari Bhakti Nendya Duta Wacana Christian University
Keywords: face authentication, geolocation, mobile MFA, usability evaluation, QR code

Abstract

The swift progress of information technology has led to the adoption of mobile-based multi-factor authentication (MFA) systems for attendance management, addressing inefficiencies, security issues, and errors inherent in traditional methods. By utilizing multiple layers of authentication—such as face recognition, geolocation, and QR code scanning—these systems significantly enhance security and reliability. This study evaluates the usability of a mobile MFA system, focusing on user-friendliness and learnability. Two iterations of the system were tested using cognitive walkthrough approaches, chosen for their effectiveness in simulating the experience of new users and identifying usability issues in system learnability. The initial version of the system utilized MobileFaceNet_v2, which had an input size of 112x112. This resulted in a false acceptance rate (FAR) of 0.26, a false rejection rate (FRR) of 0.2, and a half total error rate (HTER) of 0.23. Failures in face verifications and inadequate instructions led to significant user dissatisfaction. In the second iteration, improvements were made by providing better instructions during location and QR scan steps, adding a face capture confirmation screen, and increasing the input size of the face anti-spoof detection model to 224x224. This reduced the FAR to 0.11 but increased the FRR to 0.4, resulting in HTER to 0.25. While these updates improved security, usability issues such as ambiguous user feedback and inadequate instructions persisted. These results emphasize the need for an integrated approach that combines both technological improvements in authentication models and enhancements in UI design to create a more user-friendly experience

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Mujeye, “A Survey on Multi-Factor Authentication Methods for Mobile Devices,” in ACM Other conferences, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, pp. 199–205. doi: 10.1145/3451471.3451503.

S. Baseer and K. Charumathi, “Multi-Factor Authentication: A User Experience Study,” Available at SSRN 4840295, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4840295

A. Kruzikova, M. Muzik, L. Knapova, L. Dedkova, and ..., “Two-factor authentication time: How time-efficiency and time-satisfaction are associated with perceived security and satisfaction,” Computers & …, Vol 138, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404823005771

J. Oluwafemi and J. Feng, “How users perceive authentication of choice on mobile devices,” 13 th International Conference on Advances …, pp. 345-351, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Akintunde-Oluwafemi/publication/351365246_How_Users_Perceive_Authentication_of_Choice_on_Mobile_Devices/links/60942110458515d315ffd3d8/How-Users-Perceive-Authentication-of-Choice-on-Mobile-Devices.pdf

H. Mpirirwe, D. Mirembe, J. Lubega, J. Agaba, and ..., “A Multifactor Authentication Framework for Usability in Education Sectors in Uganda,” … Conference on Data …, pp. 205-216, 2024, doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-3242-5_15.

G. I. W. Tamtama and I. K. D. Senapartha, “Fake Face Detection System Using MobileNets Architecture,” Com, Engine, Sys, Sci, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 329, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.24114/cess.v8i2.43762.

Y. Kornelius, I. K. D. Senapartha, and G. I. W. Tamtama, “Sistem Presensi Multi Factor Dengan Menggunakan Deteksi Lokasi, Scan Qrcode, Pengecekan Antispoof Dan Pengenalan Wajah,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Universitas Islam Indonesia: Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2023, pp. 198–207. [Online]. Available: https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/45812

F. Paz et al., “Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Conduct Heuristic Evaluations: A Comparison Study,” in SpringerLink, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2024, pp. 310–323. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-61351-7_22.

R. da C. Lopes et al., “Breaking the Wall of E-Waste Recycling Education by Means of a Digital Game,” in SpringerLink, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2024, pp. 103–117. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-51452-4_8.

J. R. Lewis and J. Sauro, “Usability And User Experience: Design And Evaluation,” in Wiley Online Library, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2021, pp. 972–1015. doi: 10.1002/9781119636113.ch38.

S. Rutter, E. Zamani, J. McKenna-Aspell, and Y. Wang, “Embedding equality, diversity and inclusion in usability testing: Recommendations and a research agenda,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 188, p. 103278, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103278.

M. Hertzum, “Concurrent or Retrospective Thinking Aloud in Usability Tests: A Meta-Analytic Review,” ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1–29, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3665327.

J. W. Creswell, A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/asi/a-concise-introduction-to-mixed-methods-research/book266037

Z. Ming, M. Visani, M. M. Luqman, and J.-C. Burie, “A Survey On Anti-Spoofing Methods For Face Recognition with RGB Cameras of Generic Consumer Devices,” Oct. 08, 2020, arXiv: arXiv:2010.04145. Accessed: Jul. 20, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.04145

Z. Zhu, X. Fang, and C. Zhao, “Influence of light intensity and magnification on the precision of nanoscale positioning in micro-vision-based dark-field imaging,” Opt. Lasers Eng., vol. 169, p. 107753, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2023.107753.

S. Boovaraghavan et al., “Mites: Design and Deployment of a General-Purpose Sensing Infrastructure for Buildings,” Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–32, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1145/3580865.

D. A. Norman, Design for a Better World: Meaningful, Sustainable, Humanity Centered. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.amazon.com/Design-Better-World-Meaningful-Sustainable/dp/0262548305

Published
2024-11-22
How to Cite
[1]
I. K. Senapartha and M. Nendya, “USABILITY EVALUATION OF MOBILE MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION BASED ON FACE AUTHENTICATION, GEOLOCATION AND QR CODE”, jitk, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 425 - 432, Nov. 2024.