INTEGRATED SYSTEM-BASED SMART APPLICATION (SIPATIN) FOR STRENGTHENING FISHERIES GOVERNANCE IN LEBAK REGENCY, BANTEN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v11i2.7124Keywords:
fisheries, e-commerce , integrated governance , smart application , system usability scaleAbstract
The Fisheries Office of Lebak Regency is responsible for the management of capture fisheries, aquaculture, resource monitoring, and the marketing of fishery products. However, geographical challenges, the difficulty of obtaining real-time data, and the use of conventional monitoring and reporting methods hinder effective and sustainable fisheries governance. In addition, limited market reach—primarily targeting only local areas—further restricts the region’s economic potential. This study aims to address issues related to monitoring, reporting, and marketing through the development of an Integrated Fisheries Information System (SIPATIN), a smart mobile-based fisheries governance application integrated with a web-based monitoring platform. SIPATIN features include fishery area mapping, real-time reporting, an E-Commerce marketing platform, and a recommendation system that provides detailed information on products, seller locations, prices, reviews, estimated delivery times, and proximity-based suggestions for users. The system was developed using a prototyping method, consisting of needs analysis, design, development, testing, and evaluation based on user feedback. The application was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS), which scored 74.26 (Good), and User Acceptance Testing (UAT), involving 246 respondents and resulting in a score of 79.13 (Acceptable). The results of this study show that SIPATIN effectively supports integrated fisheries governance, enhances service efficiency at the Lebak Regency Fisheries Office, and empowers fishery business actors including fishers, fish farmers, and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in processed fish products. Furthermore, this research also produces a data-based fishery system for sustainable economic development
Downloads
References
G. Macaulay, F. Warren‐Myers, L. T. Barrett, F. Oppedal, M. Føre, and T. Dempster, “Tag Use To Monitor Fish Behaviour In Aquaculture: A Review Of Benefits, Problems And Solutions,” Rev Aquac, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1565–1582, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1111/raq.12534.
S. Gebremedhin, S. Bruneel, A. Getahun, W. Anteneh, and P. Goethals, “Scientific Methods to Understand Fish Population Dynamics and Support Sustainable Fisheries Management,” Water (Basel), vol. 13, no. 4, p. 574, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3390/w13040574.
I. Jaya et al., “Are The Working Principles Of Fisheries Management At Work In Indonesia?,” Mar Policy, vol. 140, pp. 10–50, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105047.
F. Grati et al., “Mapping small‐scale fisheries through a coordinated participatory strategy,” Fish and Fisheries, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 773–785, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1111/faf.12644.
J. Solomonsz, J. Melbourne-Thomas, A. Constable, R. Trebilco, I. van Putten, and L. Goldsworthy, “Stakeholder Engagement in Decision Making and Pathways of Influence for Southern Ocean Ecosystem Services,” Front Mar Sci, vol. 8, p. 623733, May 2021, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.623733.
S. Aminah and H. Saksono, “Digital transformation of the government: A case study in Indonesia,” Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 272–288, 2021.
Z. Konstantopoulou and P. Mikalef, “Enhancing Traceability in the Norwegian Fish Supply Chain: Blockchain Adoption,” Disruptive Innovation in a Digitally Connected Healthy World, pp. 383–393, 2024, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-72234-9_32.
S. Orofino, G. McDonald, J. Mayorga, C. Costello, and D. Bradley, “Opportunities and challenges for improving fisheries management through greater transparency in vessel tracking,” ICES Journal of Marine Science, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 675–689, May 2023, doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsad008.
N. J. Rowan, “The role of digital technologies in supporting and improving fishery and aquaculture across the supply chain–Quo Vadis?,” Aquac Fish, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 365–374, 2023.
M. Liao, J. Zhang, R. Wang, and L. Qi, “Simulation research on online marketing strategies of branded agricultural products based on the difference in opinion leader attitudes,” Information Processing in Agriculture, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 528–536, 2021.
J. Xiao, W. Wang, and S.-B. Tsai, “Coupling of agricultural product marketing and agricultural economic development based on big data analysis and ‘Internet+,’” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2021, no. 1, p. 3702064, 2021.
J. Guo, H. Hao, M. Wang, and Z. Liu, “An empirical study on consumers’ willingness to buy agricultural products online and its influencing factors,” J Clean Prod, vol. 336, p. 130403, 2022.
C. Kelly et al., “Capturing Big Fisheries Data: Integrating Fishers’ Knowledge In A Web-Based Decision Support Tool,” Front Mar Sci, vol. 9, p. 1051879, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.1051879.
D. Albadra et al., “Participatory design in refugee camps: comparison of different methods and visualization tools,” Building Research & Information, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 248–264, 2021.
J. Steinke, B. Ortiz-Crespo, J. van Etten, and A. Müller, “Participatory design of digital innovation in agricultural research-for-development: insights from practice,” Agric Syst, vol. 195, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103313.
G. E. Mushi, P.-Y. Burgi, and G. Di Marzo Serugendo, “State of Agricultural E-Government Services to Farmers in Tanzania: Toward the Participatory Design of a Farmers Digital Information System (FDIS),” Agriculture, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 475, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3390/agriculture14030475.
C. G. Devi, A. C. Deepa, M. J. S. Kumar, B. K. Chauhan, R. K. Agarwal, and S. C. Sekhar, “Marketing and Distribution Channels for Fisheries and Aqua Products in India,” J Surv Fish Sci, vol. 10, no. 3S, pp. 3095–3105, 2023.
A. Muktamar, C. S. Lumingkewas, and A. Rofi, “The Implementation of User Centered Design Method in Developing UI/UX,” JISTE (Journal of Information System, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 26–31. 2023.
N. Balasubramaniam, M. Kauppinen, A. Rannisto, K. Hiekkanen, and S. Kujala, “Transparency and explainability of AI systems: From ethical guidelines to requirements,” Inf Softw Technol, vol. 159, p. 107197, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107197.
C. Y. M. Cheng, C. C. Y. Lee, C. K. Chen, and V. W. Q. Lou, “Multidisciplinary collaboration on exoskeleton development adopting user-centered design: a systematic integrative review,” Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 909–937, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2134470.
M. Anshor, S. Basuni, H. Arief, and T. Sunarminto, “Stakeholders and network analyses in Tambora National Park, Sumbawa Island, Indonesia,” Biodiversitas, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 5446–5463, 2023, doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d241027.
F. Staiano, Designing and Prototyping Interfaces with Figma: Learn essential UX/UI design principles by creating interactive prototypes for mobile, tablet, and desktop. Packt Publishing Ltd, 2022.
Z. Chenari, M. Rezaeizadeh, and B. Bandali, “Designing a prototype of coaching software and measuring its usability,” Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2022.5800.2281.
R. T. Y. Tong, Y. K. Yuan, N. W. Dong, and R. K. Ramasamy, A Review: Methods of Acceptance Testing, vol. 228. Cyberjaya, Malaysia: ICTIM, 2022.
D. Gobov, “Practical Study on Software Requirements Specification and Modelling Techniques,” International Journal of Computing, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 78–86, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.47839/ijc.22.1.2882.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dentik, Farid, Nurhaula, Diki, Akip, Anhar, Shohifah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
-a.jpg)
-b.jpg)
