EVALUATION OF ANN- LEVENBERG MARQUARDT MODELS FOR FAULT DETECTION IN SMART FARMING SYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v11i4.7481Keywords:
Artificial Neural Network, Fault Detection, Internet of Things (IoT), Levenberg–Marquardt, Smart FarmingAbstract
Sensor readings in open field monitoring systems are influenced by disruptions, degradation, and operational unreliability. These conditions may result in inaccurate data and unreliable system decisions. However, existing studies focus on detection accuracy and rarely examine the trade-off between detection performance and computational efficiency of Artificial Neural Networks trained using the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm (ANN–LM) in smart farming environments. This study evaluates the fault-detection capability of ANN–LM for soil moisture sensor readings by analyzing both detection performance (accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score) and computational efficiency (execution time, CPU usage, and memory consumption), thereby addressing the trade-off between performance and efficiency. Baseline data, hypothetical dataset that represent the soil moisture reading from a smart chilli pepper farming system in normal operating conditions, were used to generate fault-injected datasets representing four common faults: drift, bias, spike, and malfunction. The ANN–LM model was evaluated under five fault-detection scenarios with different network architectures. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, while computational cost was assessed through execution time, CPU usage, and memory usage. The results show that ANN–LM achieves an accuracy of 0.996–0.999, precision of 1.000, recall of 0.987–1.000, and F1-scores of 0.992–1.000 across all scenarios. Simple ANN architectures give accuracy of 0.997 with reduced execution time (33.74 seconds) and lower CPU usage (50.50%) compared to more complex architectures that require 591.88 seconds and 78.40% CPU usage. Therefore, these results indicate point out that ANN–LM is suitable for smart agricultural systems under resource-constrained conditions.
Downloads
References
[1] C. Arya, “Iot Based Precision Farming and Agriculture - Aspects and Technologies,” Mathematical Statistician and Engineering Applications, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 1426–1433, 2021, doi: 10.17762/msea.v70i2.2335.
[2] N. Jadhav, B. Rajnivas, V. Subaprıya, S. Sivaramakrishnan, and S. Premalatha, “Enhancing Crop Growth Efficiency Through IoT-enabled Smart Farming System,” Eai Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things, vol. 10, 2023, doi: 10.4108/eetiot.4604.
[3] N. Vemuri, N. Thaneeru, and V. M. Tatikonda, “Smart Farming Revolution: Harnessing IoT for Enhanced Agricultural Yield and Sustainability,” Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology Issn 2959-6386 (Online), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 143–148, 2023, doi: 10.60087/jklst.vol2.n2.p148.
[4] Y. S. Tan, L. W. Chew, Y. X. Tan, and S. Z. Tan, “IoT-based Smart Farming System,” International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.54938/ijemdcsai.2024.03.1.270.
[5] U. Saeed, Y.-D. Lee, S. U. Jan, and I. Koo, “CAFD: Context-Aware Fault Diagnostic Scheme towards Sensor Faults Utilizing Machine Learning,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 2. 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21020617.
[6] X. Zou et al., “Current Status and Prospects of Research on Sensor Fault Diagnosis of Agricultural Internet of Things,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1–25, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23052528.
[7] M. M. Rahman, A. Abdulhamid, S. Kabir, and P. Gope, “Failure Analysis of IoT-based Smart Agriculture System: Towards Sustainable Food Security,” in 2023 5th International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry 5.0 (STI), 2023, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/STI59863.2023.10464772.
[8] S. Qazi, B. A. Khawaja, and Q. U. Farooq, “IoT-Equipped and AI-Enabled Next Generation Smart Agriculture: A Critical Review, Current Challenges and Future Trends,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 21219–21235, 2022, doi: 10.1109/access.2022.3152544.
[9] X. Yuan, Y. Fan, C. Zhou, X. Wang, and G. Zhang, “Research on Twin Extreme Learning Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Multi-Scale Weighted Permutation Entropy,” Entropy, vol. 24, no. 9, p. 1181, 2022, doi: 10.3390/e24091181.
[10] J. S. Prashanth, G. B. Krishna, A. V. K. Prasad, and P. R. Rao, “Smart Farming Revolution: A Cutting-Edge Review of Deep Learning and IoT Innovations in Agriculture,” SN Operations Research Forum, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–39, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s43069-025-00434-z.
[11] T. Nguyen, H.-B. Ly, H. Thi, and V. Q. Tran, “On the Training Algorithms for Artificial Neural Network in Predicting the Shear Strength of Deep Beams,” Complexity, vol. 2021, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/5548988.
[12] S. Rao et al., “Day-Ahead Load Demand Forecasting in Urban Community Cluster Microgrids Using Machine Learning Methods,” Energies, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15176124.
[13] P. Agarwal, J. I. M. Gonzalez, A. Elkamel, and H. Budman, “Hierarchical Deep LSTM for Fault Detection and Diagnosis for a Chemical Process,” Processes, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 2557, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/pr10122557.
[14] H. O. Choe and M. Lee, “Artificial Intelligence-Based Fault Diagnosis and Prediction for Smart Farm Information and Communication Technology Equipment,” Agriculture, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 2124, 2023, doi: 10.3390/agriculture13112124.
[15] S. Wahjuni, W. Wulandari, and M. Kholili, “Development of Fuzzy-Based Smart Drip Irrigation System for Chili Cultivation,” JUITA: Jurnal Informatika, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 115, May 2022, doi: 10.30595/juita.v10i1.12998.
[16] K. A. Kharusi, A. E. Haffar, and M. Mesbah, “Adaptive Machine-Learning-Based Transmission Line Fault Detection and Classification Connected to Inverter-Based Generators,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 15, p. 5775, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16155775.
[17] V. Borja-Jaimes, M. Adam‐Medina, B. López-Zapata, L. G. V Valdés, L. C. Pachecano, and E. M. Sánchez-Coronado, “Sliding Mode Observer-Based Fault Detection and Isolation Approach for a Wind Turbine Benchmark,” Processes, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 54, 2021, doi: 10.3390/pr10010054.
[18] G.-J. Qi and J. Luo, “Small Data Challenges in Big Data Era: A Survey of Recent Progress on Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Methods,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 2168–2187, 2022, doi: 10.1109/tpami.2020.3031898.
[19] G. Wrat, P. Ranjan, S. K. Mishra, J. T. Jose, and J. C. Das, “Neural Network-Enhanced Internal Leakage Analysis for Efficient Fault Detection in Heavy Machinery Hydraulic Actuator Cylinders,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, vol. 239, no. 3, pp. 1021–1031, 2024, doi: 10.1177/09544062241289309.
[20] M. K. AlOmar, F. Khaleel, A. A. AlSaadi, M. M. Hameed, M. A. AlSaadi, and N. Al-Ansari, “The Influence of Data Length on the Performance of Artificial Intelligence Models in Predicting Air Pollution,” Advances in Meteorology, vol. 2022, pp. 1–20, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/5346647
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Luh Kesuma Wardhani, Agus Buono, Sri Wahjuni, Muhamad Syukur

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






-a.jpg)
-b.jpg)











