SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IMPLEMENTATION FOR CONTINUOUS LEARNING: BENEFITS, IMPACTS, AND CHALLENGES

Authors

  • Winanti Winanti Universitas Insan Pembangunan Indonesia
  • Yoga Prihastomo Universitas Insan Pembangunan Indonesia
  • Yulius Denny Prabowo Binus University image/svg+xml
  • Achmad Sidik Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Bina Sarana Global
  • Penny Hendriyati Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Ilmu Komputer (STTIKOM) Insan Unggul
  • Muhamad Luthfian Universitas Insan Pembangunan Indonesia
  • Rizky Setiawan Universitas Insan Pembangunan Indonesia
  • Wardiansyah Wardiansyah Universitas Insan Pembangunan Indonesia
  • Zaki Ma'rufan Chandra Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Ilmu Komputer Insan Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v11i3.7583

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Benefit, Challenges, Impact, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is believed to be a crucial driver and force for realizing sustainable learning, so there is an urgent need to consolidate existing research to provide a clear and structured understanding of its tangible benefits, broader impacts, and ongoing challenges. This systematic literature review (SLR) aims to fill this gap by offering a concise overview of the role of AI in supporting sustainable learning in terms of benefits, impacts, and challenges in the era of society. Through a periodic review (SLR) of studies published between 2023 to 2025, this paper summarizes evidence on how AI enhances student learning engagement. This synthesis outlines the challenges, impacts, and pitfalls of using AI. The findings reveal that AI-driven tools—including intelligent tutoring systems, chatbots, emotion recognition systems, and adaptive learning platforms—significantly enhance personalized learning experiences and student motivation. This review synthesizes the technological landscape, outlining its benefits, impacts, and persistent challenges. Despite its potential, ethical, technical, and pedagogical hurdles remain. Consequently, this study lays the groundwork for future research and development in AI-based continuous learning. This study has several limitations. The literature review does not cover the specific designs and methodologies for measuring student engagement with AI. It also focuses on explicit outcomes like engagement and motivation, potentially overlooking unintended consequences or long-term impacts of AI integration. Furthermore, the analysis is constrained by the varying methodological quality and reporting transparency of the primary studies included.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Shennan, C. Smith, L. L. B. Hons, and H. M. Chapman, “Enhancing undergraduate nurses ’ online learning engagement : A mixed methods study,” Teach. Learn. Nurs., vol. 000, no. 2025, pp. 1–8, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2025.12.004.

[2] A. Al-Shammari and S. Al-Enezi, “Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Learning Outcomes of Pre-Service Social Studies Teachers,” J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 163–196, 2024.

[3] E. Youssef, M. Medhat, S. Abdellatif, and M. Al Malek, “Examining the effect of ChatGPT usage on students’ academic learning and achievement: A survey-based study in Ajman, UAE,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, no. September, p. 100316, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100316.

[4] W. Winanti, S. Basuki, and N. Nurasiah, “A Systematic Literature Review : Impact of Generative AI as Technology to Learning in Higher Education,” KHAZANAH Inform., vol. 10, no. 2, 2025.

[5] S. T. B and S. T. C, “ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?,” J. Appl. Learn. Teach., vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9.

[6] S. Sok and K. Heng, “Opportunities, challenges, and strategies for using ChatGPT in higher education: A literature review,” J. Digit. Educ. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, p. ep2401, 2023, doi: 10.30935/jdet/14027.

[7] C. Hafferty et al., “Engagement in the digital age: Understanding ‘what works’ for participatory technologies in environmental decision-making,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 365, no. June, p. 121365, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121365.

[8] T. Matos, W. Santos, E. Zdravevski, P. J. Coelho, I. M. Pires, and F. Madeira, “A systematic review of artificial intelligence applications in education: Emerging trends and challenges,” Decis. Anal. J., vol. 15, no. December 2024, p. 100571, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100571.

[9] E. Ukwandu, O. Omisade, K. Jones, S. Thorne, and M. Castle, “The future of teaching and learning in the context of emerging artificial intelligence technologies,” Futures, vol. 171, no. May 2024, p. 103616, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2025.103616.

[10] A. K. Khoso, W. Honggang, and M. A. Darazi, “Empowering creativity and engagement: The impact of generative artificial intelligence usage on Chines EFL students’ language learning experience,” Comput. Hum. Behav. Reports, vol. 18, no. November 2024, p. 100627, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100627.

[11] O. J. Sunday, O. O. Adesope, D. Shenghai, and K. Carbonneau, “The effects of concept mapping experience , feedback timing , and motivation on students ’ learning outcomes,” Learn. Motiv., vol. 92, no. October, 2025.

[12] M. R. Mohd Amin, I. Ismail, and V. M. Sivakumaran, “Revolutionizing Education with Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Challenges, and Implications for Open and Distance Learning (ODL),” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 11, no. December 2024, p. 101308, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101308.

[13] C. Van Slyke, R. Johnson, and J. Sarabadani, “Generative Artificial Intelligence in Information Systems Education: Challenges, Consequences, and Responses,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2023, doi: 10.17705/1cais.05301.

[14] T. Wang et al., “Exploring the Potential Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on International Students in Higher Education: Generative AI, Chatbots, Analytics, and International Student Success,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 11, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13116716.

[15] F. de Arriba-Pérez, S. García-Méndez, and F. J. González-Castaño, “‘a Piece of Cake’ - Sustainable Education Practices With Transformer Models,” 17th Int. Conf. e-Learning Digit. Learn. 2023, ELDL 2023 11th Int. Conf. Sustain. Technol. Educ. 2023, STE 2023, no. April, pp. 146–153, 2023, doi: 10.33965/el_ste2023_202303l019.

[16] E. Micheni, J. Machii, and J. Murumba, “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education,” Open J. Inf. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 2024, doi: 10.32591/coas.ojit.0701.04043m.

[17] M. M. A. Parambil et al., “Integrating AI-based and conventional cybersecurity measures into online higher education settings: Challenges, opportunities, and prospects,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, no. June, p. 100327, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100327.

[18] K. Ohashi, K. Nakanishi, Y. Yasui, and S. Ishii, “Deep Adversarial Reinforcement Learning Method to Generate Control Policies Robust Against Worst-Case Value Predictions,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 100798–100809, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3314750.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-23

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2026): JITK Issue February 2026

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Winanti Winanti, Yoga Prihastomo, Yulius Denny Prabowo, Achmad Sidik, Penny Hendriyati, Muhamad Luthfian; Rizky Setiawan, Wardiansyah Wardiansyah; Zaki Ma'rufan Chandra

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

[1]
“SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IMPLEMENTATION FOR CONTINUOUS LEARNING: BENEFITS, IMPACTS, AND CHALLENGES”, jitk, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 911–919, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.33480/jitk.v11i3.7583.