TRANSFORMER-BASED GENERATIVE CHATBOT FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INFORMATION SERVICES WITH HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION AND MODEL EVALUATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v12i1.8295Keywords:
Chatbot, Deep Learning, Generative AI, Higher Education, TransformerAbstract
Generative AI has revolutionized the creation of realistic multimedia content, including chatbots that generate human-like responses. This technology significantly improves higher education by enabling universities to provide fast, accurate, and efficient information services. Generative chatbots can handle multiple users simultaneously and operate 24/7, increasing productivity and accessibility. The model was developed using Machine Learning Lifecycle (MLLC) with deep learning algorithm and Transformer architecture. The dataset used consists of 5,403 question-answer pairs from Institut Teknologi Garut (ITG), which are divided into 5,089 pairs for training and 314 pairs for testing. From 12 hyperparameter configurations, the best combination (maxlen 80, num_layers 2, batch_size 128, embedding_dim 256, fully_connected_dim 256, num_heads 2, positional_encoding_length 512, learning_rate 0.0002, and epoch 100) achieved a BLEU score of 71.03% on the ITG dataset. Evaluation using ROUGE and METEOR also shows consistent performance, indicating good content coverage and semantic similarity. Retraining with another dataset using the same approach resulted in a slightly higher BLEU score of 72.05%, with a different optimal learning rate of 0.00025. The results of this study indicate that Transformer-based generative chatbots can support higher education services and highlight the importance of adjusting hyperparameters based on dataset characteristics. This research also provides opportunities to develop similar models in other universities by adapting datasets and exploring more advanced methods to improve performance in broader educational contexts.
Downloads
References
[1] P. Kumar, “Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 57, no. 10, p. 260, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10462-024-10888-y.
[2] W. X. Zhao et al., "A Survey of Large Language Models," Frontiers of Computer Science, vol. 20, no. 12, Art. no. 2012627, pp. 1–144, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s11704-026-60308-3.
[3] C. Chaka, “Generative AI Chatbots - ChatGPT versus YouChat versus Chatsonic: Use Cases of Selected Areas of Applied English Language Studies,” Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.22.6.1.
[4] T. Wang et al., “Exploring the Potential Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on International Students in Higher Education: Generative AI, Chatbots, Analytics, and International Student Success,” Appl. Sci. Switz., vol. 13, no. 11, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13116716.
[5] T. Adiguzel, M. H. Kaya, and F. K. Cansu, “Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT,” Contemp. Educ. Technol., vol. 15, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.30935/cedtech/13152.
[6] T. Rasul et al., “The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions,” J. Appl. Learn. Teach., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 41–56, 2023, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29.
[7] T. Thamodharan and M. F. A. Ghani, “A proposed model of ICT facilities in the central zone vocational colleges, Malaysia,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 845–858, 2023, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v12i2.24258.
[8] A. Aljanazrah, G. Yerousis, and G. Hamed, “Digital transformation in times of crisis : Challenges , attitudes , opportunities and lessons learned from students ’ and faculty members ’ perspectives,” no. October, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.1047035.
[9] A. Kharchenko et al., "Digital Technologies as a Factor of Transformation of Learning in the University Education," Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 97–126, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.18662/rrem/16.4/909.
[10] S. Janthakal, G. M. Reddy, Stevenson. P, K. S. Aqtar, and A. G. S, “AI-Based Chatbot for College Management System,” Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 3633–3637, 2023, doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2023.52059.
[11] A. Sarkar et al., "Unlocking the microblogging potential for science and medicine," bioRxiv preprint bioRxiv:2022.04.22.488804, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1101/2022.04.22.488804.
[12] Suryani and Mustakim, “An Intelligent Chatbot for Faculty Administration Using Bidirectional LSTM and Seq2Seq Architecture,” in 2024 International Conference on Smart Computing, IoT and Machine Learning (SIML), 2024, pp. 226–231. doi: 10.1109/SIML61815.2024.10578161.
[13] N. Esfandiari, K. Kiani, and R. Rastgoo, “A Conditional Generative Chatbot using Transformer Model,” Sep. 08, 2023, arXiv: arXiv:2306.02074. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2306.02074.
[14] S. Islam et al., “A comprehensive survey on applications of transformers for deep learning tasks,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 241, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122666.
[15] J. Ferrando, G. I. Gállego, I. Tsiamas, and M. R. Costa-Jussà, “Explaining How Transformers Use Context to Build Predictions,” Proc. Annu. Meet. Assoc. Comput. Linguist., vol. 1, pp. 5486–5513, 2023, doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.301.
[16] Y. Heryanto and A. Triayudi, “Evaluating Text Quality of GPT Engine Davinci-003 and GPT Engine Davinci Generation Using BLEU Score,” vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 121–129, 2023, doi: 10.58905/SAGA.vol1i4.213.
[17] A. Frummet and D. Elsweiler, “Decoding the Metrics Maze : Navigating the Landscape of Conversational Question Answering System Evaluation in Procedural Tasks,” pp. 81–90, 2024.
[18] F. F. Kartamanah, A. R. Atmadja, and I. Budiman, "Analyzing PEGASUS Model Performance with ROUGE on Indonesian News Summarization," Sinkron: Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 31–42, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.14303.
[19] M. Lyu et al., “Natural Language Generation in Healthcare: A Review of Methods and Applications,” 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2026.104997.
[20] G. Cloud, “Evaluating models | AutoML Translation Documentation.” [Online]. Available: https://cloud.google.com/translate/automl/docs/evaluate
[21] Y. Guo, “Interpretability analysis in transformers based on attention visualization,” Appl. Comput. Eng., vol. 76, pp. 92–102, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.54254/2755-2721/76/20240571.
[22] R. Katırcı and H. Çeli̇k, “Analyzing The Impact Of Attention Head Count On Transformer-Based Machine Translation,” 2025, pp. 105–116.
[23] X. Ke, P. Hu, C. Yang, and R. Zhang, "Human–Machine Multi-Turn Language Dialogue Interaction Based on Deep Learning," Micromachines, vol. 13, no. 3, Art. no. 355, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/mi13030355.
[24] Z. Lv, “Generative artificial intelligence in the metaverse era,” Cogn. Robot., vol. 3, no. May, pp. 208–217, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cogr.2023.06.001.
[25] R. Gozalo-Brizuela and E. C. Garrido-Merchán, "A Survey of Generative AI Applications," Journal of Computer Science, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 801–818, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.3844/jcssp.2024.801.818.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Leni Fitriani, Endang Prayoga Hidayatulloh, Dede Kurniadi, Muhammad Rikza Nashrulloh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






-a.jpg)
-b.jpg)











