SURVEY PAPER: SOFTWARE AUTOMATED TESTING TOOL USING SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW METHOD

  • Dheanda Absharina Universitas Gunadarma
  • Fahirah Fahirah Universitas Gunadarma
  • Fenni Agustina Universitas Gunadarma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33480/pilar.v16i2.1456
Keywords: automated testing tools, software testing, systematic literature review

Abstract

Software testing is one of the most important roles in successful software development. The increasing complexity of software development requires the development team to use automated testing tools to test the quality and functionality of the application. In software testing, choosing a testing tool must be appropriate and in accordance with the software to be tested. Using the Systematic Literature Review method, this research collects and analyzes previous survey papers from 2 keywords, "Comparative of Automated Software Testing Tools" and "A Critical Analysis of Automated Software Testing Tools" on Google Scholar with a span of 2010 - 2020. Results from papers collected through 5 stages of the SLR, resulting in 11 papers that were reviewed. From these 11 journals, obtained 5 automated testing tools that are often discussed, Selenium, QTP, TestCompelete, Watir, and Ranorex. The results of this study indicate that there is no software automatic testing tool that is truly perfect because every automated software testing tool has its own strengths and weaknesses and it is expected that the results of this study can help software testers in choosing automatic testing tools according to their needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anjum, H., Imran, M., Jehanzeb, M., Khan, M., Chaudhry, S., Sultana, S., Shahid, Z., Zeshan, F., & Nazir, S. (2017). A Comparative Analysis of Quality Assurance of Mobile Applications using Automated Testing Tools. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(7), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2017.080733

Bharti, T., & Dutt, E. V. (2014). Relative Review of Automated Testing Tools : ( QTP ) Quick Test Professional , Selenium and Test Complete testing is the process of giving the input to the. 2(6).

Gamido, H. V., & Gamido, M. V. (2019). Comparative review of the features of automated software testing tools. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9(5), 4473–4478. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i5.pp4473-4478

Imran, M., Hebaishy, M. A., & Alotaibi, A. S. (2016). A Comparative Study of QTP and Load Runner Automated Testing Tools and their Contributions to Software Project Scenario. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 4(1), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRCCE.2016

Izzati, A. N., & Najwa, N. F. (2018). Pengaruh Stakeholder Perspective Dalam Penerapan ERP: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 5(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.201851540

Jagannatha, S., Niranjanamurthy, M., Manushree, S., & Chaitra, G. (2014). Comparative Study on Automation Testing using Selenium Testing Framework and QTP. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 310(10), 258–267.

Jain, A., Jain, M., & Dhankar, S. (2014). A Comparison of RANOREX and QTP Automated Testing Tools and their impact on Software Testing. Ijems, 1(1), 8–12.

Jain, V., & Rajnish, K. (2018). Comparative Study of Software Automation Testing Tools : OpenScript and Selenium. Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 8(2), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.9790/9622-0802032933

Kaur, H., & Gupta, G. (2013). Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: Selenium, Quick Test Professional and Testcomplete. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 3(5), 1739–1743. https://doi.org/10.18701/imsmanthan.v11i01.6879

Kaur, M., & Kumari, R. (2011). Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: TestComplete and QuickTest Pro. International Journal of Computer Applications, 24(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5120/2918-3844

Mahmood, H., & Sirshar, M. (2017). A Case Study of Web Based Application by Analyzing Performance of a Testing Tool. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 7(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijeme.2017.04.06

Malik, V., & Gahlan, M. (2016). Comparative Study of Automated Web Testing Tools. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology, 6(3), 8. http://www.ijltet.org/journal/55.pdf

Malve, S., & Sharma, P. (2017). Investigation of Manual and Automation Testing using Assorted Approaches. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering, 5(2), 81–87.

Monier, M., & El-mahdy, M. M. (2015). Evaluation of automated web testing tools. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 4(5), 405–408. https://doi.org/10.7753/ijcatr0405.1014

Okezie, F., Odun-Ayo, I., & Bogle, S. (2019). A Critical Analysis of Software Testing Tools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1378(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/4/042030

Shalini, & Thakur, J. (2017). Web Performance Testing Tools – A Review. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, V(X), 1057–1063. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2017.10154

Shaukat, K., Shaukat, U., Feroz, F., Kayani, S., & Akbar, A. (2015). Taxonomy of Automated Software Testing Tools. International Journal of Computer Science and Innovation, 2015(1), 7–18. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.735.4191&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Singh, I., & Tarika, B. (2014). Comparative Analysis of Open Source Automated Software Testing Tools: Selenium, Sikuli and Watir. International Journal of Information & Computation Technology, 4(15), 1507–1518. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1418.4324

Sualim, S. A., Yassin, N. M., & Mohamad, R. (2016). Comparative Evaluation of Automated User Acceptance Testing Tool for Web Based Application. International Journal of Software Engineering and Technology 02(2) 1-6 International, 02(2), 1–6. http://files/590/Sualim et al. - 2016 - Comparative Evaluation of Automated User Acceptanc.pdf

Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Werla Putra, G., & Iswara, B. (2019). Metode Systematic Literature Review untuk Identifikasi Platform dan Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v1i2.1916

Published
2020-09-16
How to Cite
Absharina, D., Fahirah, F., & Agustina, F. (2020). SURVEY PAPER: SOFTWARE AUTOMATED TESTING TOOL USING SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW METHOD. Jurnal Pilar Nusa Mandiri, 16(2), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.33480/pilar.v16i2.1456
Issue
Vol 16 No 2 (2020): Pilar Nusa Mandiri : Journal of Computing and Information System Publishing Period for September 2020
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2020 Dheanda Absharina, Fahirah Fahirah, Fenni Agustina

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

An author who publishes in the Pilar Nusa Mandiri: Journal of Computing and Information System agrees to the following terms:

  1. Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  2. Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
    Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.