SURVEY PAPER: SOFTWARE AUTOMATED TESTING TOOL USING SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW METHOD
Software testing is one of the most important roles in successful software development. The increasing complexity of software development requires the development team to use automated testing tools to test the quality and functionality of the application. In software testing, choosing a testing tool must be appropriate and in accordance with the software to be tested. Using the Systematic Literature Review method, this research collects and analyzes previous survey papers from 2 keywords, "Comparative of Automated Software Testing Tools" and "A Critical Analysis of Automated Software Testing Tools" on Google Scholar with a span of 2010 - 2020. Results from papers collected through 5 stages of the SLR, resulting in 11 papers that were reviewed. From these 11 journals, obtained 5 automated testing tools that are often discussed, Selenium, QTP, TestCompelete, Watir, and Ranorex. The results of this study indicate that there is no software automatic testing tool that is truly perfect because every automated software testing tool has its own strengths and weaknesses and it is expected that the results of this study can help software testers in choosing automatic testing tools according to their needs.
Anjum, H., Imran, M., Jehanzeb, M., Khan, M., Chaudhry, S., Sultana, S., Shahid, Z., Zeshan, F., & Nazir, S. (2017). A Comparative Analysis of Quality Assurance of Mobile Applications using Automated Testing Tools. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(7), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2017.080733
Bharti, T., & Dutt, E. V. (2014). Relative Review of Automated Testing Tools : ( QTP ) Quick Test Professional , Selenium and Test Complete testing is the process of giving the input to the. 2(6).
Gamido, H. V., & Gamido, M. V. (2019). Comparative review of the features of automated software testing tools. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9(5), 4473–4478. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i5.pp4473-4478
Imran, M., Hebaishy, M. A., & Alotaibi, A. S. (2016). A Comparative Study of QTP and Load Runner Automated Testing Tools and their Contributions to Software Project Scenario. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 4(1), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRCCE.2016
Izzati, A. N., & Najwa, N. F. (2018). Pengaruh Stakeholder Perspective Dalam Penerapan ERP: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 5(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.201851540
Jagannatha, S., Niranjanamurthy, M., Manushree, S., & Chaitra, G. (2014). Comparative Study on Automation Testing using Selenium Testing Framework and QTP. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 310(10), 258–267.
Jain, A., Jain, M., & Dhankar, S. (2014). A Comparison of RANOREX and QTP Automated Testing Tools and their impact on Software Testing. Ijems, 1(1), 8–12.
Jain, V., & Rajnish, K. (2018). Comparative Study of Software Automation Testing Tools : OpenScript and Selenium. Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 8(2), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.9790/9622-0802032933
Kaur, H., & Gupta, G. (2013). Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: Selenium, Quick Test Professional and Testcomplete. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 3(5), 1739–1743. https://doi.org/10.18701/imsmanthan.v11i01.6879
Kaur, M., & Kumari, R. (2011). Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: TestComplete and QuickTest Pro. International Journal of Computer Applications, 24(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5120/2918-3844
Mahmood, H., & Sirshar, M. (2017). A Case Study of Web Based Application by Analyzing Performance of a Testing Tool. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 7(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijeme.2017.04.06
Malik, V., & Gahlan, M. (2016). Comparative Study of Automated Web Testing Tools. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology, 6(3), 8. http://www.ijltet.org/journal/55.pdf
Malve, S., & Sharma, P. (2017). Investigation of Manual and Automation Testing using Assorted Approaches. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering, 5(2), 81–87.
Monier, M., & El-mahdy, M. M. (2015). Evaluation of automated web testing tools. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 4(5), 405–408. https://doi.org/10.7753/ijcatr0405.1014
Okezie, F., Odun-Ayo, I., & Bogle, S. (2019). A Critical Analysis of Software Testing Tools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1378(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1378/4/042030
Shalini, & Thakur, J. (2017). Web Performance Testing Tools – A Review. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, V(X), 1057–1063. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2017.10154
Shaukat, K., Shaukat, U., Feroz, F., Kayani, S., & Akbar, A. (2015). Taxonomy of Automated Software Testing Tools. International Journal of Computer Science and Innovation, 2015(1), 7–18. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.735.4191&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Singh, I., & Tarika, B. (2014). Comparative Analysis of Open Source Automated Software Testing Tools: Selenium, Sikuli and Watir. International Journal of Information & Computation Technology, 4(15), 1507–1518. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1418.4324
Sualim, S. A., Yassin, N. M., & Mohamad, R. (2016). Comparative Evaluation of Automated User Acceptance Testing Tool for Web Based Application. International Journal of Software Engineering and Technology 02(2) 1-6 International, 02(2), 1–6. http://files/590/Sualim et al. - 2016 - Comparative Evaluation of Automated User Acceptanc.pdf
Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Werla Putra, G., & Iswara, B. (2019). Metode Systematic Literature Review untuk Identifikasi Platform dan Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v1i2.1916
Abstract viewed = 7 times
PDF downloaded = 2 times
Copyright (c) 2020 Dheanda Absharina, Fahirah Fahirah, Fenni Agustina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to the PILAR Nusa Mandiri journal as the publisher of the journal, and the author also holds the copyright without restriction.
Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations. The reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in databases, and its transmission by any form or media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopies, recordings, magnetic media, etc. , are allowed with written permission from the PILAR Nusa Mandiri journal.
PILAR Nusa Mandiri journal, the Editors and the Advisory International Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions, or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the PILAR Nusa Mandiri journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.