• Dheanda Absharina (1*) Universitas Gunadarma
  • Fahirah Fahirah (2) Universitas Gunadarma
  • Fenni Agustina (3) Universitas Gunadarma

  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: automated testing tools, software testing, systematic literature review


Software testing is one of the most important roles in successful software development. The increasing complexity of software development requires the development team to use automated testing tools to test the quality and functionality of the application. In software testing, choosing a testing tool must be appropriate and in accordance with the software to be tested. Using the Systematic Literature Review method, this research collects and analyzes previous survey papers from 2 keywords, "Comparative of Automated Software Testing Tools" and "A Critical Analysis of Automated Software Testing Tools" on Google Scholar with a span of 2010 - 2020. Results from papers collected through 5 stages of the SLR, resulting in 11 papers that were reviewed. From these 11 journals, obtained 5 automated testing tools that are often discussed, Selenium, QTP, TestCompelete, Watir, and Ranorex. The results of this study indicate that there is no software automatic testing tool that is truly perfect because every automated software testing tool has its own strengths and weaknesses and it is expected that the results of this study can help software testers in choosing automatic testing tools according to their needs.


Download data is not yet available.


Anjum, H., Imran, M., Jehanzeb, M., Khan, M., Chaudhry, S., Sultana, S., Shahid, Z., Zeshan, F., & Nazir, S. (2017). A Comparative Analysis of Quality Assurance of Mobile Applications using Automated Testing Tools. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(7), 249–255.

Bharti, T., & Dutt, E. V. (2014). Relative Review of Automated Testing Tools : ( QTP ) Quick Test Professional , Selenium and Test Complete testing is the process of giving the input to the. 2(6).

Gamido, H. V., & Gamido, M. V. (2019). Comparative review of the features of automated software testing tools. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9(5), 4473–4478.

Imran, M., Hebaishy, M. A., & Alotaibi, A. S. (2016). A Comparative Study of QTP and Load Runner Automated Testing Tools and their Contributions to Software Project Scenario. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 4(1), 457–466.

Izzati, A. N., & Najwa, N. F. (2018). Pengaruh Stakeholder Perspective Dalam Penerapan ERP: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 5(1), 41.

Jagannatha, S., Niranjanamurthy, M., Manushree, S., & Chaitra, G. (2014). Comparative Study on Automation Testing using Selenium Testing Framework and QTP. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 310(10), 258–267.

Jain, A., Jain, M., & Dhankar, S. (2014). A Comparison of RANOREX and QTP Automated Testing Tools and their impact on Software Testing. Ijems, 1(1), 8–12.

Jain, V., & Rajnish, K. (2018). Comparative Study of Software Automation Testing Tools : OpenScript and Selenium. Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 8(2), 29–33.

Kaur, H., & Gupta, G. (2013). Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: Selenium, Quick Test Professional and Testcomplete. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 3(5), 1739–1743.

Kaur, M., & Kumari, R. (2011). Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: TestComplete and QuickTest Pro. International Journal of Computer Applications, 24(1), 1–7.

Mahmood, H., & Sirshar, M. (2017). A Case Study of Web Based Application by Analyzing Performance of a Testing Tool. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 7(4), 51–58.

Malik, V., & Gahlan, M. (2016). Comparative Study of Automated Web Testing Tools. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology, 6(3), 8.

Malve, S., & Sharma, P. (2017). Investigation of Manual and Automation Testing using Assorted Approaches. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering, 5(2), 81–87.

Monier, M., & El-mahdy, M. M. (2015). Evaluation of automated web testing tools. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 4(5), 405–408.

Okezie, F., Odun-Ayo, I., & Bogle, S. (2019). A Critical Analysis of Software Testing Tools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1378(4).

Shalini, & Thakur, J. (2017). Web Performance Testing Tools – A Review. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, V(X), 1057–1063.

Shaukat, K., Shaukat, U., Feroz, F., Kayani, S., & Akbar, A. (2015). Taxonomy of Automated Software Testing Tools. International Journal of Computer Science and Innovation, 2015(1), 7–18.

Singh, I., & Tarika, B. (2014). Comparative Analysis of Open Source Automated Software Testing Tools: Selenium, Sikuli and Watir. International Journal of Information & Computation Technology, 4(15), 1507–1518.

Sualim, S. A., Yassin, N. M., & Mohamad, R. (2016). Comparative Evaluation of Automated User Acceptance Testing Tool for Web Based Application. International Journal of Software Engineering and Technology 02(2) 1-6 International, 02(2), 1–6. http://files/590/Sualim et al. - 2016 - Comparative Evaluation of Automated User Acceptanc.pdf

Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Werla Putra, G., & Iswara, B. (2019). Metode Systematic Literature Review untuk Identifikasi Platform dan Metode Pengembangan Sistem Informasi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 63.

How to Cite
Absharina, D., Fahirah, F., & Agustina, F. (2020). SURVEY PAPER: SOFTWARE AUTOMATED TESTING TOOL USING SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW METHOD. Jurnal Pilar Nusa Mandiri, 16(2), 175-182.
Article Metrics

Abstract viewed = 1241 times
PDF downloaded = 638 times