Diterbitkan Oleh:
Lembaga Penelitian Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Nusa Mandiri
Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.
KOMPARASI ALGORITMA DENGAN PENDEKATAN RANDOM UNDERSAMPLING UNTUK MENANGANI KETIDAKSEIMBANGAN KELAS PADA PREDIKSI CACAT SOFTWARE
Keywords:
Naive Bayes, J48, Random Forest, Random Undersampling, Prediksi Cacat Software.
Abstract
Testing is a process that becomes a standard in producing quality software. In predictions of software defects, prediction errors are very bad. Incorrect and inappropriate data sets result in inaccurate prediction results will be affect the software itself. This study aims to overcome the problem of class imbalance with the software defect prediction data set, through the Random Undersampling (RUS) data level approach by taking several algorithms namely Naive Bayes (NB), J48 and Random Forest (RF) which aims to compare the accuracy level highest so that maximum results are obtained in the process of predicting software defects. From the results of this study it can be found that to overcome class imbalances using the Random Undersampling level data approach to predict software defects, the highest level of accuracy is obtained by the Random Forest algorithm with an accuracy rate of 71.932%.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Akbar, M. S., & Rochimah, S. (2017). Prediksi Cacat Perangkat Lunak Dengan Optimasi Naive Bayes Menggunakan Gain Ratio. Jurnal Sistem Dan Informatika, 11, 147–155.
Andri, Kunang, Y. N., & Murniati, S. (2013). Implementasi Teknik Data Mining Untuk Memprediksi Tingkat Kelulusan Mahasiswa pada Universitas Bina Darma Palembang, 2013(June 2016), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4212.1845
Aries, S., & Wahono, R. S. (2015). Pendekatan Level Data untuk Menangani Ketidakseimbangan Kelas pada Prediksi Cacat Software. Journal of Software Engineering, 1(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1896-1126(14)00030-3
Diwandari, S., & Setiawan, N. A. (2015). Perbandingan Algoritme J48 dan Nbtree Untuk Klasifikasi Diagnosa Penyakit Pada Soybean. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 2015(Sentika), 205–212.
Frank, E., Hall, M., Trigg, L., Holmes, G., & Witten, I. H. (2004). Data Mining in Bioinformatics using Weka. Bioinformatics, 20(15), 2479–2481. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth261
Frastian, N., Hendrian, S., & Valentino, V. H. (2018). Komparasi Algoritma Klasifikasi Menentukan Kelulusan Mata Kuliah Pada Universitas. Faktor Exacta, 11(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.30998/faktorexacta.v11i1.1826
Okutan, A., & Yildiz, O. T. (2014). Software Defect Prediction using Bayesian Networks. Empirical Software Engineering, 19(1), 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-012-9218-8
PROMISE. (2010). Data sets for software defect prediction. Retrieved from http://tunedit.org/repo/PROMISE/DefectPrediction
Putra, D. S., Wibawa, A. D., & Purnomo, M. H. (2016). Berjalan Menggunakan Random Forest, 1(1), 51–56.
Putri, S. A., & Frieyadie. (2017). Combining Integreted Sampling Technique With Feature Selection For Software Defect Prediction. In 2017 5th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) (pp. 1–6). Bali: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM.2017.8089264
Shuo Wang, & Xin Yao. (2013). Using Class Imbalance Learning for Software Defect Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 62(2), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2013.2259203
Siringoringo, R. (2017). Integrasi Metode Resampling dan K-Nearest Naighbor pada Prediksi Cacat Software Aplikasi Android. ISD, 2 No.1(1), 47–58.
Tharwat, A. (2018). Classification assessment methods. Applied Computing and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003
Andri, Kunang, Y. N., & Murniati, S. (2013). Implementasi Teknik Data Mining Untuk Memprediksi Tingkat Kelulusan Mahasiswa pada Universitas Bina Darma Palembang, 2013(June 2016), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4212.1845
Aries, S., & Wahono, R. S. (2015). Pendekatan Level Data untuk Menangani Ketidakseimbangan Kelas pada Prediksi Cacat Software. Journal of Software Engineering, 1(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1896-1126(14)00030-3
Diwandari, S., & Setiawan, N. A. (2015). Perbandingan Algoritme J48 dan Nbtree Untuk Klasifikasi Diagnosa Penyakit Pada Soybean. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 2015(Sentika), 205–212.
Frank, E., Hall, M., Trigg, L., Holmes, G., & Witten, I. H. (2004). Data Mining in Bioinformatics using Weka. Bioinformatics, 20(15), 2479–2481. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth261
Frastian, N., Hendrian, S., & Valentino, V. H. (2018). Komparasi Algoritma Klasifikasi Menentukan Kelulusan Mata Kuliah Pada Universitas. Faktor Exacta, 11(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.30998/faktorexacta.v11i1.1826
Okutan, A., & Yildiz, O. T. (2014). Software Defect Prediction using Bayesian Networks. Empirical Software Engineering, 19(1), 154–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-012-9218-8
PROMISE. (2010). Data sets for software defect prediction. Retrieved from http://tunedit.org/repo/PROMISE/DefectPrediction
Putra, D. S., Wibawa, A. D., & Purnomo, M. H. (2016). Berjalan Menggunakan Random Forest, 1(1), 51–56.
Putri, S. A., & Frieyadie. (2017). Combining Integreted Sampling Technique With Feature Selection For Software Defect Prediction. In 2017 5th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM) (pp. 1–6). Bali: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CITSM.2017.8089264
Shuo Wang, & Xin Yao. (2013). Using Class Imbalance Learning for Software Defect Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 62(2), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2013.2259203
Siringoringo, R. (2017). Integrasi Metode Resampling dan K-Nearest Naighbor pada Prediksi Cacat Software Aplikasi Android. ISD, 2 No.1(1), 47–58.
Tharwat, A. (2018). Classification assessment methods. Applied Computing and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003
Published
2019-03-07
How to Cite
Ginabila, G., & Fauzi, A. (2019). KOMPARASI ALGORITMA DENGAN PENDEKATAN RANDOM UNDERSAMPLING UNTUK MENANGANI KETIDAKSEIMBANGAN KELAS PADA PREDIKSI CACAT SOFTWARE. Jurnal Pilar Nusa Mandiri, 15(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.33480/pilar.v15i1.28
Article Metrics
Abstract viewed = 427 times
PDF downloaded = 611 times
Abstract viewed = 427 times
PDF downloaded = 611 times
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2019 Ginabila & Settings Ahamd Fauzi
An author who publishes in the Pilar Nusa Mandiri: Journal of Computing and Information System agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
