SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS ON AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC SECTOR

  • Handini Mekkawati Universitas Indonesia
  • Teguh Raharjo Universitas Indonesia
  • Rina Yuniarti Universitas Indonesia
Keywords: agile, agile project management, challenges, public sector, SLR

Abstract

The public sector is transforming by adopting an agile approach to overcome bureaucratic rigidity and lagging the private sector. The aim is to overcome the limitations of traditional approaches by encouraging flexibility in planning, operations, and service delivery. In the face of diverse, agile characteristics, further research is required on the challenges and best practices other public sector organizations can adopt. This research identifies key challenges in agile implementation within the PMBOK 7th edition project performance domains with the most issues: Development Approach and Life Cycle and Project Work Domain. Using a systematic literature review (SLR), 35 of 680 reviewed papers were selected as references. The biggest challenges were in the Project Work Domain, dominated by the context of monitoring new work and changes, project processes, and procurement processes. Best practices were identified to address these challenges and guide other public sectors in supporting more flexible and responsive public service delivery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Project Management Institute and KPMG, “2022 Project Management Survey,” pp. 1–18, 2023.

D. Scur, R. Sadun, J. Van Reenen, R. Lemos, and N. Bloom, “The World Management Survey at 18: lessons and the way forward,” Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 231–258, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grab009.

H. Dib, A. Di Lodovico, J. Sengupta, A. Lamaa, and D. Mahadevan, “Better and faster: Organizational agility for the public sector.” [Online]. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/better-and-faster-organizational-agility-for-the-public-sector

W. D. Eggers and J. O’Leary, “When Agile meets government.” [Online]. Available: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/agile-in-government-culture-shift.html

Project Management Institute, “Pulse of the Profession 2024 - The Future of Project Work: Moving Past Office-Centric Models,” 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.pmi.org/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/future-of-project-work

M. Bogdanova, E. Parashkevova, and M. Stoyanova, “Agile Project Management In Public Sector - Methodological Aspects,” J. Eur. Econ., vol. 19, no. Vol 19, No 2 (2020), pp. 283–298, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.35774/jee2020.02.283.

P. P. Abdullah, T. Raharjo, B. Hardian, and T. Simanungkalit, “Challenges and Best Practices Solution of Agile Project Management in Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review,” Int. J. Informatics Vis., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 606–614, 2023, doi: 10.30630/joiv.7.2.1098.

P. Marnada, T. Raharjo, B. Hardian, and A. Prasetyo, “Agile project management challenge in handling scope and change: A systematic literature review,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 197, pp. 290–300, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.143.

P. O. Santos and M. M. de Carvalho, “Exploring the challenges and benefits for scaling agile project management to large projects: a review,” Requir. Eng., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 117–134, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00766-021-00363-3.

A. K. Nisyak, K. Rizkiyah, and T. Raharjo, “Human Related Challenges in Agile Software Development of Government Outsourcing Project,” in 2020 7th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Sciences and Informatics (EECSI), 2020, pp. 222–229. doi: 10.23919/EECSI50503.2020.9251899.

H. Dwi Harfianto et al., “Agile Transformation Challenges and Solutions in Bureaucratic Government: A Systematic Literature Review,” in Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business, in ICCMB ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022, pp. 12–19. doi: 10.1145/3512676.3512679.

PMI, “Project Performace Domain.” [Online]. Available: https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/pmbok-standards/pmbok-project-performance-domains.pdf?v=ffd77553-1316-424f-83d1-83c95469ce2c#:~:text=The Development Approach %26 Life Cycle,cycle phases of the project.

M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” J. Clin. Epidemiol., vol. 134, pp. 178–189, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001.

G. Shang, S. P. Low, and X. Y. V Lim, “Prospects, drivers of and barriers to artificial intelligence adoption in project management,” Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 629–645, 2023, doi: 10.1108/BEPAM-12-2022-0195.

J. R. Noennig, F. Mello Rose, P. Stadelhofer, A. Jannack, and S. Kulashri, “Agile development for urban digitalisation: insights from the creation of Dresden’s smart city strategy,” Meas. Bus. Excell., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 193–208, May 2024, doi: 10.1108/MBE-09-2023-0142.

L. Ika, J. Meredith, and O. Zwikael, “Project governance: the impact of environmental changes on governance adaptations in large-scale projects,” Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., vol. 17, no. 4/5, pp. 829–854, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-03-2024-0056.

D. Baxter, N. Dacre, H. Dong, and S. Ceylan, “Institutional challenges in agile adoption: Evidence from a public sector IT project,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 40, no. 4, p. 101858, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101858.

A. Mahura and G. Birollo, “Organizational practices that enable and disable knowledge transfer: The case of a public sector project-based organization,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 270–281, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.12.002.

J. Šimíčková, K. Buganová, and E. Mošková, “Specifics of the Agile Approach and Methods in Project Management and its Use in Transport,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 55, pp. 1436–1443, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.07.130.

T. Alsanoosy, M. Spichkova, and J. Harland, “Exploratory analysis of cultural influences on requirements engineering activities based on stakeholders’ profile,” in Procedia Computer Science, 2020, pp. 3379–3388. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.059.

K. M. Rowe, S. J. Whitty, and A. L. Wheeldon, “The Pragmatic Comportment Compass: Rethinking projectification in public sector projects,” Proj. Leadersh. Soc., vol. 5, p. 100152, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.plas.2024.100152.

K. Wadood, N. Nigar, M. K. Shahzad, S. Islam, A. Jaleel, and D. Abalo, “Large-Scale Agile Transformations for Software Quality Assurance: An Empirical Case Study from Pakistan,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/6153744.

E. Lulaj, I. Zarin, and S. Rahman, “A Novel Approach to Improving E-Government Performance from Budget Challenges in Complex Financial Systems,” Complexity, vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/2507490.

G. Chandrachooodan, R. Radhika, and R. R. Palappan, “Identifying the relevant project management tools in implementation of e-governance projects - Journey from traditional to agile,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0119802.

M. C. Rodrigues, L. Domingues, and J. P. Oliveira, “Tailoring: A case study on the application of the seventh principle of PMBOK 7 in a public institution.,” in Procedia Computer Science, 2023, pp. 1735–1743. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.468.

V. Obradović, “PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A CONCEPTUAL ROADMAP,” Eur. Proj. Manag. J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 63–70, 2022, doi: 10.56889/ghxu9566.

B. Blaskovics, Z. M. Maró, G. Klimkó, V. Papp-Horváth, and Á. Csiszárik-Kocsir, “Differences between Public-Sector and Private-Sector Project Management Practices in Hungary from a Competency Point of View,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 14, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151411236.

G. S. Pereira, O. Novaski, N. F. dos Santos Neto, and F. D. A. da Silva Mota, “Study on the state of the art of critical success factors and project management performance,” Gest. e Prod., vol. 29, 2022, doi: 10.1590/1806-9649-2022v29e4722.

A. Aoufi, M. Schoeman, and N. Turner, “How to Outsource Agile Projects Effectively: Suppliers and client advisors need to work closely with client organizations to ensure key enablers are in place to increase success when outsourcing Agile projects.,” Res. Technol. Manag., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2021, doi: 10.1080/08956308.2022.1987792.

O. P. Tripathi, A. K. Jain, and K. N. Jha, “Evaluation of the Infrastructure Project Management System of Government Organizations and Suggestions for Their Improvement,” J. Leg. Aff. Disput. Resolut. Eng. Constr., vol. 15, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000562.

D. Fransisca, T. Raharjo, B. Hardian, and A. Suhanto, “Success factors for agile adoption in one of the ministries in Indonesia,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0114847.

F. Escobar, W. H. C. Almeida, and J. Varajão, “Digital transformation success in the public sector: A systematic literature review of cases, processes, and success factors,” Inf. Polity, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 61–81, 2023, doi: 10.3233/IP-211518.

M. Ylinen, “Incorporating agile practices in public sector IT management: A nudge toward adaptive governance,” Inf. Polity, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 251–271, 2021, doi: 10.3233/IP-200269.

D. Car-Pušić, I. Marović, and G. Bulatović, “Development of a hybrid agile management model in local self-government units,” Teh. Vjesn., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1418–1426, 2020, doi: 10.17559/TV-20190205140719.

A. Bonomi Savignon and L. Costumato, “Project management logics for agile public strategic management: Propositions from the literature and a research agenda,” Inf. Polity, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 153–178, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3233/IP-230061.

J. de S. Pinto and R. da S. Leme, “Analysis of project management principles with the Scrum framework in systems development,” Brazilian J. Oper. Prod. Manag., vol. 21, no. 2, p. 1878, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.14488/BJOPM.1878.2024.

D. Ghimire, S. Charters, and S. Gibbs, “Scaling agile software development approach in government organization in New Zealand,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2020, pp. 100–104. doi: 10.1145/3378936.3378945.

S. Prakash, “Empirical Framework to Determine Maturity of Digital Transformation of a Service to Citizens through Enhancements on Existing Assessment Methods – Case Study India,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, in ICEGOV ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2022, pp. 301–308. doi: 10.1145/3560107.3560154.

F. Gualdi and K. Idemitsu, “Navigating Public Values: How the Social Construction of Technology among Public Managers Defines the Nature of Public Values: Findings from a Japanese e-Government Project,” in DG.O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, in DG.O’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, pp. 398–407. doi: 10.1145/3463677.3463723.

K. Maroukian and S. R. Gulliver, “The Link Between Transformational and Servant Leadership in DevOps-Oriented Organizations,” in Proceedings of the 2020 European Symposium on Software Engineering, in ESSE ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, pp. 21–29. doi: 10.1145/3393822.3432340.

M. Dietel and M. Heine, “Agility in public sector IT projects,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2020, pp. 803–806. doi: 10.1145/3428502.3428625.

K. Rizkiyah, A. K. Nisyak, and T. Raharjo, “Agile-Based Requirement Challenges of Government Outsourcing Project: A Case Study,” in 2020 3rd International Conference on Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE), 2020, pp. 267–273. doi: 10.1109/IC2IE50715.2020.9274659.

A. Alzayed, “Assessing Requirements Engineering Practices’ Impact on Electronic Government Solution Sustainability,” in 2024 4th International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET), IEEE, May 2024, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/IRASET60544.2024.10549276.

P. Ciancarini, R. Giancarlo, and G. Grimaudo, “Digital Transformation in the Public Administrations: A Guided Tour for Computer Scientists,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 22841–22865, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3363075.

B. A. Rodriguez, V. T. Aquiatan, C. J. A. Verallo, S. B. Agpad, R. C. De Loyola, and E. J. P. Bibangco, “Digitalization of Document Management and Monitoring in the Department of the Interior and Local Government Negros Occidental,” in 2024 15th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), IEEE, Jun. 2024, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/ICCCNT61001.2024.10724748.

Published
2024-11-26
How to Cite
[1]
H. Mekkawati, T. Raharjo, and R. Yuniarti, “SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS ON AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC SECTOR”, jitk, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 449 - 460, Nov. 2024.