A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM USING ROC-TOPSIS TO SPECIFY ELIGIBILITY IN THE FAMILY HOPE PROGRAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v11i1.6457Keywords:
decision making, family hope program, ROC, TOPSISAbstract
Selection committee at Jetis Village Sukoharjo Regency, Indonesia had difficulty to assign FHP assistance recipients priority. This is a problem must be resolved so that selection committee can be helped to determine which candidates are entitled to receive. This research is to develop a system using Rank Order Centroid (ROC) and Technique For Order Preference By Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods and measure accuracy level of two methods used. Data used is 150 on potential 2024 FHP assistance recipients obtained from Jetis. From 150 real data in 2024, there were 71 people receiving FHP assistance, while a system developed in this research is produced 62 recipients. ROC method is used to specify each criterion importance level and TOPSIS method to process data which ultimately results in a potential ranking aid recipients. From comparison of original data and research results, there were 121 data had same system output as original data. From an accuracy rate of 81%, ROC and TOPSIS methods show the potential to increase accuracy and fairness in determining priority for candidates who are entitled to receive FHP assistance.
Downloads
References
R. Purwono, W. W. Wardana, T. Haryanto, and M. Khoerul Mubin, “Poverty dynamics in Indonesia: empirical evidence from three main approaches,” World Dev. Perspect., vol. 23, p. 100346, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.wdp.2021.100346.
Z. Sharafi, “Poverty and perseverance: The detrimental effect of poverty on effort provision,” J. Dev. Econ., vol. 162, no. May, p. 103040, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.103040.
J. Chen and Z. Zhang, “Family poverty and adolescents’ cognitive and noncognitive outcomes: Evidence from China,” Econ. Hum. Biol., vol. 54, no. August, p. 101402, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2024.101402.
R. P. Barth and Y. Xu, “Family poverty, family adversity, neglect, and entry into out-of-home care,” J. Public Child Welf., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 694–714, 2024, doi: 10.1080/15548732.2023.2248048.
N. K. Adjei et al., “Impact of poverty and family adversity on adolescent health: a multi-trajectory analysis using the UK Millennium Cohort Study,” Lancet Reg. Heal. - Eur., vol. 13, no. February, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100279.
A. Parawangi and N. Wahid, “Poverty Alleviation in the Hope Family Program in Makassar,” J. Local Gov. Issues ( LOGOS ), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v6i1.21627.
U. S. Umayah, E. W. Trilestari, S. D. Putrianti, M. N. Afandi, and A. Rahman, “Analysis of the Improvement of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in the New Normal Era,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Administrative Science (ICAS 2022), Atlantis Press SARL, 2023, pp. 349–360. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-104-3_34.
R. Kurniawan, Ishak, Humaizi, and Sanusi, “Breaking the Chains of Poverty: Examining the Efficacy of the Family Hope Program in Indonesia and Its Alignment with Policy Theories,” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 3567–3576, 2024, doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.190924.
N. Anriyani, B. Pinem, and S. Rahmah, “Implementation of the Family Hope Program on Community Welfare in Lubuk District Siak Regency,” in International Conference on Economic and Social Sciences, 2024, pp. 330–341.
A. Tenri, M. Yunus, and A. Thaba, “Analysis of Survival Strategies of Poor Female Heads of Households in Sadar Village, North Luwu Regency,” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan., vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 4061–4071, 2024, doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.191034.
Taryono, Syapsan, H. Ekwarso, S. E. Kornita, L. Sari, and Darnilawati, “Sustainability of Family Hope Program in Batu Bersurat Village, XIII Koto Kampar District, Kampar Regency, Riau, Indonesia,” J. Econ. Sustain. Dev., vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 32–42, 2023, doi: 10.7176/jesd/14-10-04.
S. Fox-Dichter, V. Yeo, and A. Hetling, “Community Networks with a Family Focus: Success Factors in Implementing a TANF Funded Housing Support Program,” J. Soc. Serv. Res., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 282–296, 2024, doi: 10.1080/01488376.2023.2284787.
M. Bergolo and G. Cruces, “The Anatomy of Behavioral Responses to Social Assistance When Informal Employment is High,” SSRN Electron. J., vol. 193, p. 104313, 2021, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2840141.
M. Shanmuganathan and T. Nalini, “Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Topsis) Applied to Image Fusion -Limitations,” in 2021 International Conference on Intelligent Technologies, CONIT 2021, 2021, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/CONIT51480.2021.9498545.
E. Ebrahimi, M. R. Fathi, and S. M. Sobhani, “A Modification of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) through Fuzzy Similarity Method (a Numerical Example of the Personnel Selection),” J. Appl. Res. Ind. Eng., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 203–217, 2023, doi: 10.22105/jarie.2022.296088.1359.
F. W. Azhar, Z. H. Abd Rahim, N. A. Fahami, S. K. N. Abdul Rahim, and H. A. Karim, “Investing in Malaysian healthcare using technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1723–1730, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v25.i3.pp1723-1730.
W. Shaqina, R. Naura, and S. H. Mansyur, “Application Of Group Decision Making In Determining Culinary Tourism With TOPSIS And BORDA Methods,” JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetah. dan Teknol. Komputer), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 236–246, 2024, doi: 10.33480/ jitk.v9i2.5017.
T. Varshney et al., “Investigation of rank order centroid method for optimal generation control,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 38760466, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61945-z.
Sasikala and P. B. Rao, “Ranking fuzzy numbers by volume of solid of revolution of membership function about axis of support,” Decis. Sci. Lett., vol. 8, no. 2023, pp. 429–440, 2024, doi: 10.5267/dsl.2023.7.006.
M. O. Esangbedo, J. Xue, S. Bai, and C. O. Esangbedo, “Relaxed Rank Order Centroid Weighting MCDM Method with Improved Grey Relational Analysis for Subcontractor Selection: Photothermal Power Station Construction,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 71, pp. 3044–3061, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2022.3204629.
A. A. Musaddad and A. Kriswibowo, “Optimalizing Big Data in Reducing Miss-Targeting Family Hope Program (PKH) in Sidoarjo Disctrict with Approach Machine Learning,” IJCCS (Indonesian J. Comput. Cybern. Syst., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 99, 2021, doi: 10.22146/ijccs.62589.
M. N. Sutoyo and A. T. S. Mangkona, “The selection of SNMPTN applicants using the TOPSIS and rank order centroid (ROC) methods,” Ilk. J. Ilm., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 272–284, 2021, doi: 10.33096/ilkom.v13i3.936.272-284.
D. S. Br Ginting, R. Lamtiur Sipahutar, F. Natalida, C. N. Kudadiri, and D. E. R. Purba, “Combination AHP and TOPSIS Methods Optimizes Performance of Decision Support System for The Recipients Family Hope Program in Huta Limbong Padang Sidempuan,” in 2021 International Conference on Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Business Analytics (DATABIA), 2021, pp. 70–74. doi: 10.1109/DATABIA53375.2021.9650342.
N. Hanin and H. Purwanto, “Analysis comparison model of ROC-TOPSIS, ROC-WP, and ROC-Electre methods for supporting the funding decision to micro-enterprises Indonesia,” J. Def. Model. Simul., vol. 0, no. 0, p. 2024, 2024, doi: 10.1177/15485129241235681.
T. T. L. Nguyen, T. N. Tran, T. H. N. Nguyen, T. Q. Bui, and T. T. H. Nguyen, “Applying TOPSIS to selecting business accounting software: A case study at Truong Son Technology Development Investment Joint Stock Company,” Decis. Sci. Lett., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 845–852, 2024, doi: 10.5267/j.dsl.2024.8.007.
A. Points and E. Roszkowska, “A Multi-Criteria Method Integrating Distances to Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1–28, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16081025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yusuf Sutanto, Heribertus Ary Setyadi, Pudji Widodo, Budi Al Amin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
-a.jpg)
-b.jpg)
