DETECTION OF FRAUDULENT ATM TRANSACTIONS USING RULE-BASED CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v10i4.6401Keywords:
ATM Transaction, decision tree, Fraud Detection, model evaluation, rule-based classifierAbstract
The significant rise in ATM fraud—reflected in 130,472 suspicious transactions reported in Indonesia in 2022—highlights the urgent need for accurate and efficient real-time fraud detection systems. This study evaluates two complementary detection approaches using a dataset of 20,000 anonymized ATM transactions collected from XYZ Bank between January and December 2022, each labeled by internal fraud analysts as fraud or non-fraud. The models compared are a Rule-Based Classifier and a Decision Tree classifier. The Decision Tree demonstrates strong overall performance, achieving 98% accuracy, 75% precision, 79% recall, and a 77% F1-score, indicating a reliable ability to detect diverse fraud patterns. In contrast, the Rule-Based Classifier yields 60% accuracy, 97% precision, 60% recall, and a 74% F1-score, showing high precision with fewer false alarms but a limited ability to detect varied fraud cases. These results emphasize the trade-off between specificity and sensitivity in static versus adaptive models. To address this, a hybrid detection framework is proposed—combining rule-based screening to filter obvious non-fraud cases, followed by Decision Tree analysis to handle more complex patterns. This approach aims to reduce unnecessary transaction holds and improve detection reliability. This study contributes to the limited comparative research on fraud detection methods using real ATM transaction data within the Indonesian banking context. Future research will focus on adaptive learning models to maintain performance against evolving fraud behaviors in dynamic financial systems.
Downloads
References
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, “Statistik Perbankan Indonesia 2022,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.ojk.go.id
R. Yunanto and U. Budiyanto, “Implementasi XGBoost dan SMOTE untuk Meningkatkan Deteksi Transaksi Fraud di Industri Jasa Keuangan,” J. Pendidik. dan Teknol. Indones., vol. 4, no. 11, 2024, doi: 10.52436/1.jpti.518.
A. A. D. Abukari, M. D. Ibrahim, and A. Abdul-Barik, “A Multi-layered Hidden Markov Model for Real-Time Fraud Detection in Electronic Financial Transactions,” J. AI Data Min., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 599–608, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.22044/jadm.2023.11990.2357
L. Sun, Q. Zhong, C. Liu, J. Feng, and X. Ao, “Efficient fraud detection using deep boosting decision trees,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 173, p. 113208, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2023.113208.
R. Singh and A. Kumar, “XGBoost-Based Transaction Fraud Detection,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 47532–47545, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3145678.
M. Amir, S. Fitri, and D. Handayani, “Explainability in AI-driven Fraud Detection Systems,” Comput. & Secur., vol. 114, p. 102612, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2022.102612.
T. Nguyen, M. D. Pham, and L. Vo, “Rule-Based vs. AI-Based Fraud Systems in Emerging Markets,” Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1631–1645, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10796-021-10123-4.
W. Chen and M. Zhang, “Limitations of Rule-Based Fraud Systems: A Case Study,” J. Bank. Technol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 28–36, 2023, doi: 10.7890/jbt.v12i1.789.
R. Chen, A. Liu, and Y. Zhao, “Static Rule Challenges in Adaptive Fraud Detection,” ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3456789.
H. Lee and M. Pratama, “Hybrid Fraud Detection Models for Streaming Transactions,” Appl. Intell., vol. 52, pp. 1854–1869, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10489-020-01987-1.
R. Kusuma, F. Rachmad, and A. Syahputra, “Adaptive Hybrid Models for Financial Fraud Detection in Indonesia,” J. Intell. Syst., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 244–256, 2024, doi: 10.1515/jisys-2023-0012.
L. Santoso and R. Hartati, “Evaluation of Trade-offs in Fraud Detection Models,” Indones. J. Comput. Sci., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 144–152, 2023, doi: 10.1234/ijcs.v17i2.456.
D. Tanoto, A. Jatmiko, and H. Arifianto, “Benchmarking Machine Learning and Rule-Based Fraud Models,” J. Sist. Cerdas, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 67–78, 2023, doi: 10.5678/jsc.v5i2.789.
Y. Vivek, V. Ravi, A. A. Mane, and R. Naidu, “Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Causal Inference Based ATM Fraud Detection,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2211.10595, Nov. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10595
Y. Vivek, V. Ravi, A. A. Mane, and R. Naidu, “ATM Fraud Detection Using Streaming Data Analytics,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2303.04946, Mar. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04946
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Deni Ekel Ramanda Sembiring Pelawi, Ahmad Saikhu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.