THE ROLE OF L1 REGULARIZATION IN ENHANCING LOGISTIC REGRESSION FOR EGG PRODUCTION PREDICTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v10i4.6409Kata Kunci:
egg production prediction, environmental factors, logistic regression, l1 regularizationAbstrak
Poultry egg productivity is strongly influenced by various environmental factors, such as air and water quality. However, accurately predicting productivity remains a challenge due to the complex interplay of multiple environmental variables and the risk of overfitting in predictive models. This study improves egg productivity prediction using Logistic Regression with L1 regularization, which enhances model generalization by performing automatic feature selection. The research methodology includes data collection of key environmental indicators—Air Quality Index (AQI), Water Quality Index (WQI), and Humidex—followed by data preprocessing, exploratory data analysis (EDA), and model training using L1-regularized Logistic Regression. Model evaluation was performed using classification metrics and learning curve analysis to assess stability and effectiveness. Experimental results indicate that Logistic Regression without regularization achieved an accuracy of 90.7%, with misclassification occurring in the lower production categories. By applying L1 regularization, accuracy increased significantly to 97%, demonstrating its ability to reduce overfitting while improving classification performance. This study also compares its findings with previous research, such as De Col et al. (wheat epidemic prediction, 80–85% accuracy) and Jia Q1 et al. (heart disease prediction, 92.39% accuracy), confirming that our approach outperforms prior Logistic Regression models in similar predictive tasks. These findings suggest that L1 regularization is an effective solution for improving egg productivity prediction, particularly in scenarios with complex environmental influences. Future work will explore advanced ensemble learning techniques and real-time IoT-based monitoring to further enhance prediction accuracy and practical applicability.
Unduhan
Referensi
R. B. Bist et al., “Sustainable poultry farming practices: A critical review of current strategies and future prospects,” Poult. Sci., p. 104295, 2024.
W. E. Sawyer, A. O. Aigberua, M. U. Nwodo, and M. Akram, “Overview of Air Pollutants and Their One Health Effects,” Springer, 2024.
C. M. Ncho, J. I. Berdos, V. Gupta, A. Rahman, K. T. Mekonnen, and A. Bakhsh, “Abiotic stressors in poultry production: A comprehensive review,” J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 30–50, 2025.
O. O. Apalowo, D. A. Ekunseitan, and Y. O. Fasina, “Impact of Heat Stress on Broiler Chicken Production,” Poultry, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 107–128, 2024.
I. Attri, L. K. Awasthi, and T. P. Sharma, “Machine learning in agriculture: a review of crop management applications,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 12875–12915, 2024.
E. Küçüktopçu, B. Cemek, and H. Simsek, “Modeling Environmental Conditions in Poultry Production: Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach,” Animals, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 501, 2024.
W. Y. Leong, Y. Z. Leong, and W. San Leong, “Eco-efficient poultry farms: Leveraging IoT for sustainable production,” in 2024 9th International Conference on Applying New Technology in Green Buildings (ATiGB), IEEE, 2024, pp. 432–437.
X. Yang et al., “Computer vision-based cybernetics systems for promoting modern poultry farming: a critical review,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 225, p. 109339, 2024.
M. Aruna et al., “Enhancing safety in surface mine blasting operations with IoT based ground vibration monitoring and prediction system integrated with machine learning,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 3999, 2025.
A. H. Alsaeedi et al., “Fractal feature selection model for enhancing high-dimensional biological problems,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 12, 2024.
D. Theng and K. K. Bhoyar, “Feature selection techniques for machine learning: a survey of more than two decades of research,” Knowl. Inf. Syst., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1575–1637, 2024.
R. Dey, N. Das, S. Mondal, B. Sadhukhan, and A. Dey, “Geo-AQI: A Real-Time Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting System using ARIMA Model,” in 2024 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN), IEEE, 2024, pp. 1102–1108.
A. J. Siciliano, C. Zhao, T. Liu, and Z. Wang, “EGG: Accuracy Estimation of Individual Multimeric Protein Models Using Deep Energy-Based Models and Graph Neural Networks,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 25, no. 11, p. 6250, 2024.
N. Alamsyah, B. Budiman, T. P. Yoga, and R. Y. R. Alamsyah, “XGBOOST HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION USING RANDOMIZEDSEARCHCV FOR ACCURATE FOREST FIRE DROUGHT CONDITION PREDICTION,” J. Pilar Nusa Mandiri, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 103–110, 2024.
M. J. Karim, M. O. F. Goni, M. Nahiduzzaman, M. Ahsan, J. Haider, and M. Kowalski, “Enhancing agriculture through real-time grape leaf disease classification via an edge device with a lightweight CNN architecture and Grad-CAM,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 16022, 2024.
A. Soltani and C. L. Lee, “The non-linear dynamics of South Australian regional housing markets: A machine learning approach,” Appl. Geogr., vol. 166, p. 103248, 2024.
N. Alamsyah, T. P. Yoga, B. Budiman, and others, “IMPROVING TRAFFIC DENSITY PREDICTION USING LSTM WITH PARAMETRIC ReLU (PReLU) ACTIVATION,” JITK J. Ilmu Pengetah. Dan Teknol. Komput., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 154–160, 2024.
J. Duan, J. Xiong, Y. Li, and W. Ding, “Deep learning based multimodal biomedical data fusion: An overview and comparative review,” Inf. Fusion, p. 102536, 2024.
L. N. Habibi, T. Matsui, and T. S. Tanaka, “Critical evaluation of the effects of a cross-validation strategy and machine learning optimization on the prediction accuracy and transferability of a soybean yield prediction model using UAV-based remote sensing,” J. Agric. Food Res., vol. 16, p. 101096, 2024.
M. Hajihosseinlou, A. Maghsoudi, and R. Ghezelbash, “Regularization in machine learning models for MVT Pb-Zn prospectivity mapping: applying lasso and elastic-net algorithms,” Earth Sci. Inform., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 4859–4873, 2024.
X. Cheng, “A Comprehensive Study of Feature Selection Techniques in Machine Learning Models,” 2024.
L. A. van Veen, H. van den Brand, A. C. van den Oever, B. Kemp, and A. Youssef, “An adaptive expert-in-the-loop algorithm for flock-specific anomaly detection in laying hen production,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 229, p. 109755, 2025.
Y. Ge, J. Ma, and G. Sun, “A structural pruning method for lithium-ion batteries remaining useful life prediction model with multi-head attention mechanism,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 86, p. 111396, 2024.
N. Alamsyah, A. P. Kurniati, and others, “Event Detection Optimization Through Stacking Ensemble and BERT Fine-tuning For Dynamic Pricing of Airline Tickets,” IEEE Access, 2024.
N. Alamsyah, A. P. Kurniati, and others, “A Novel Airfare Dataset To Predict Travel Agent Profits Based On Dynamic Pricing,” in 2023 11th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), IEEE, 2023, pp. 575–581.
S. Zhao et al., “Comparative analysis of chloroplast genome of Meconopsis (Papaveraceae) provides insights into their genomic evolution and adaptation to high elevation,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 25, no. 4, p. 2193, 2024.
N. Alamsyah, Budiman, V. R. Danestiara, I. Akbar, and E. Setiana, “Optimizing Computational Efficiency in Feature Selection for Machine Learning Models: A Study Crime Detection Based on Criminal Data,” in 2023 Eighth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), 2023, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICIC60109.2023.10382057.
A. G. Putrada, I. D. Oktaviani, M. N. Fauzan, and N. Alamsyah, “CNN Pruning for Edge Computing-Based Corn Disease Detection with a Novel NG-Mean Accuracy Loss Optimization,” Telematika, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 68–83, 2024.
J. Shang, Z. Xiao, T. Tao, J. Wang, and Z. Wu, “A heuristic method for discovering multi-class classification rules from multi-source data in cloud–edge system,” J. King Saud Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 36, no. 2, p. 101962, 2024.
N. Alamsyah, B. Budiman, T. P. Yoga, and R. Y. R. Alamsyah, “COMPARISON LINEAR REGRESSION AND RANDOM FOREST MODELS FOR PREDICTION OF UNDERGROUND DROUGHT LEVELS IN FOREST FIRES,” J. Techno Nusa Mandiri, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 81–86, 2024.
##submission.downloads##
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Nur Alamsyah, Budiman Budiman, Elia Setiana, Valencia Claudia Jennifer

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.