PENENTUAN KELAYAKAN BANGUNAN CAGAR BUDAYA MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIMPLE MULTI ATTRIBUTE RATING TECHNIQUE (SMART)

  • Hesti Ratna Setyaningrum (1*) STT. Wastukancana Purwakarta
  • Muhammad Rafi Muttaqin (2) STT. Wastukancana Purwakarta
  • Mochzen Gito Resmi (3) STT. Wastukancana Purwakarta

  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Cultural Conservation, Decision Support System, SMART

Abstract

Abstract Nowadays, awareness of the importance of cultural heritage is decreasing among the public, especially among youth who will become leaders and inherit the culture of their region. Law Number 11 of 2010 stipulates the importance of protecting and preserving cultural heritage because it has significant value in history, science, education, religion and culture. Therefore, the existence of cultural heritage must be considered and maintained properly according to applicable regulations. There are several criteria for assessing buildings that will be used as cultural heritage according to Law number 11 of 2010 in Chapter III, article 5, cultural heritage criteria, namely the age of the building, historical value, cultural value and architectural value. This study aims to create a system that can determine the feasibility of a building as a cultural heritage in a precise and accurate way (case study DISPORAPARBUD Purwakarta). In this study, the Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) method was used in the Decision Support System (SPK). The results of this study are to produce recommendations for buildings that are worthy of being cultural heritage in accordance with predetermined criteria, namely the Normal School building with a value of 1 by occupying the first rank, which will then be recommended to the Purwakarta DISPORAPARBUD

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394

Afifah, N., Kurniawati, I., & Heriyanto, H. (2022). Penerapan Metode Profile Matching Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Di Pt. Karya Anugrah Teknolo. INTI Nusa Mandiri, 16(2), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.33480/inti.v16i2.2765

Agustinova, D. E. (2022). Strategi Pelestarian Benda Cagar Budaya Melalui Digitalisasi. ISTORIA Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sejarah, 18(2). https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/istoria/article/view/52991

Alawi, M., Ramdani, F., & Pramono, D. (2018). Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Geografis Cagar Budaya Di Malang Raya Berbasis WEBGIS, 3D, Dan GAMIFIKASI. … Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer e …, 2(4), 1464–1474. http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/1222%0Ahttp://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/download/1222/446

Amalia, V., & Hamidani, S. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekrutmen Anggota KPPS Pemilu dengan Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique. Digital Zone: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 11(2), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.31849/digitalzone.v11i2.5204

Atthahara, H. (2018). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Berbasis E-Government : Studi Kasus Aplikasi Ogan Lopian Dinas. JURNAL POLITIKOM INDONESIANA, 3(1), 66–77.

Dewanto, I. J., Aziz, N., & Darmawan, W. (2023). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Perpanjangan Kontrak Kerja Karyawan dengan Metode SMART. MAMEN (Jurnal Manajemen), 2(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.55123/mamen.v2i1.903

Harahap, N. H. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Atlet Lari Jarak Jauh Terbaik Menggunakanmetode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART). Informasi Dan Teknologi Ilmiah (INTI), 9(1), 19–23. http://www.stmik-budidarma.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/inti/article/view/3346%0Ahttp://www.stmik-budidarma.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/inti/article/viewFile/3346/2266

M. Fadila Rahman, & Ira Safitri Darwin. (2022). Persepsi Pemilik Bangunan dalam Melestarikan Bangunan Cagar Budaya di Kawasan Braga Kota Bandung. Jurnal Riset Perencanaan Wilayah Dan Kota, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrpwk.v2i1.931

Mantovandi, A., Putri, S. A., & Buani, D. C. P. (2022). Analytical Hierarchy Process Dalam Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Berdasarkan Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia. INTI Nusa Mandiri, 16(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.33480/inti.v16i2.2741

Nopita, I., Rafi Muttaqin, M., Informatika, T., & Tinggi Teknologi Wastukancana Purwakarta, S. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Media Promosi Stt Wastukancana Purwakarta Menggunakan Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (Waspas). Jinteks, 4(3), 137–144.

Resmi, M. G., Muttaqin, M. R., & Defriani, M. (2021). Penentuan Penerimaan Bantuan Pangan Nontunai Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighted. INTECOMS: Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 4(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.31539/intecoms.v4i1.2102

Saputra, A. Y., & Mawartika, Y. E. B. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Memilih Lokasi Perumahan Dengan Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique. Cogito Smart Journal, 5(1), 35–44.

Siburian, R. M., Hutabarat, M., & Waruwu, J. (2022). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK MENENTUKAN PENERIMAAN BERAS MISKIN ( RASKIN ) DENGAN METODE WEIGHTED PRODUCT ( STUDI KASUS DESA HILIWETO KECAMATAN ONOHAZUMBA ) beras raskin di masyarakat . Untuk memecahkan permasalahan tersebut perlu suatu sistem dipangk. 17(02), 130–137.

Sutrikanti, N., & Satra, K. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Kelayakan Sebuah Bangunan Menjadi Cagar Budaya ( Studi Kasus : Dinas Kebudayaan Kota Medan ). 8, 371–377.

Tabanan, K., Made Darma Oka, B. I., Sudiarta, M., Widya Darmayanti, P., Pariwisata, J., Negeri Bali, P., Pariwisata Politeknik Negeri Bali, J., & Pariwisata Denpasar, A. (2021). Warisan “Cagar Budaya” sebagai Ikon Desa Wisata Kaba-Kaba. Jurnal Seni Budaya, 36(2), 163–169.

Published
2023-08-02
How to Cite
Setyaningrum, H., Muttaqin, M., & Resmi, M. (2023). PENENTUAN KELAYAKAN BANGUNAN CAGAR BUDAYA MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIMPLE MULTI ATTRIBUTE RATING TECHNIQUE (SMART). INTI Nusa Mandiri, 18(1), 29 - 36. https://doi.org/10.33480/inti.v18i1.4286
Article Metrics

Abstract viewed = 136 times
PDF downloaded = 127 times