Diterbitkan Oleh:
Lembaga Penelitian Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Nusa Mandiri
Creation is distributed below Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.
MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS MENENTUKAN POINT WEIGHT COMPARATION DALAM PENETAPAN DECISION PRIORITY
Keywords:
Analisis multi kriteria, Konsistensi, Skala prioritas, Analytic Hierarchical Process
Abstract
Decision-making method being used in the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP), each method has different characteristics, it can be seen from how the data acquisition was doing, whether using a single data or data groups, then how to determine the scale that will be used , and how the determination of the amount to be entered into pairwise matrix. Each method has its own way and each method will yield the amount of different values, but about priorities can result in the same decision. In this paper will try to discuss the differences in data processing, the methods used, the determination of pairwise matrix and the resulting acquisition priorities. Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA) provides an overview of the differences produced by these methods
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Asamoah, D., Annan J., Nyarko, S. 2012. International journal of business management: AHP Approach for supplier selection in a pharmaceutical manufacturing in Ghana. E-ISSN 1833-8119.Vol. 7 No. 10, May 2012. pages 49-62.
Coulter, Elizabeth D., Coakley, J, Sessions, J. 2012. The analytic hierarchical process: The tutorial for use in prioritizing forest Road investments to minimize environmental effects: International journal of forest engineering. Montana, USA. p 51-69
Coulter, Elizabeth D. 2004. Setting forest road maintenance and upgrade priorities based on environtment effects and expert judgment: A Disertation doctor of philosophy in forest enginering:. Commencement in June 2005.Oregon State University-USA. p 21-22
Gotze U., 2008: Investitionsrechnung: Modelle und Analysen zur Beurteilung von Investitionsvorhaben. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Ishizaka, Allesio, Namery Philippe. 2013. A multy criteria groups decision frame work for partner grouping when sharing facilities. Groups Decision and Negotiation. Portmouth Business School-UK. Pages 1-28.
Meixner O., R. Haas, 2002. Computergestütze Entscheidungsfindung. Ahli Choise und AHP : inovatif werkzeuge zur Losung komplexer Probleme. Frankfur, Wien: Redline Wirtschaft.
Saaty, Thomas L. 2003. Decision-Making with the AHP; Why is the Principal eigenvector necessary: European Journal of Operational Research 145 (2003) p 85–91.
Saaty, Thomas L. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchical process: International Journal survices sciences Vol. 1 No.1 2008. p 83-98
Saaty Thomas L, Vargas LG (2001): Model, Metode, Konsep & Aplikasi Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boston et al: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tomić,V.,Marinković, Z.Janošević. D., 2011. Promethee method implementation with multi criteria decisions.. Mechanical Engineering Faculty, University of Niš, A. Medvedeva 14, Niš, Serbia, Mechanical Engineering Vol. 9, No 2, 2011, pp. 193- 202.
Yang, Jiaqin and Shi, Ping . 2002. Applying Analytic Hierarchical Process in firm overall performance evaluation; a case study in China. International of business (7) 1-2002 ISSN: 1083-4346, p. 29-45.
Young, K.D. 2006. Thesis: Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Optimization Algorithm in Best Management Practice Selection: the faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. p 23-35.
Zimmer, S., Klumpp, M., Abidi, H.,2011. Industry project evaluation with the analytic hierarchical process. Institute for logistic and services management fom university of apllied science assen. Leimkugelstrabe 6-45141. Essen-Germany. www.fom-ild.de. Pages. 01-09.
Coulter, Elizabeth D., Coakley, J, Sessions, J. 2012. The analytic hierarchical process: The tutorial for use in prioritizing forest Road investments to minimize environmental effects: International journal of forest engineering. Montana, USA. p 51-69
Coulter, Elizabeth D. 2004. Setting forest road maintenance and upgrade priorities based on environtment effects and expert judgment: A Disertation doctor of philosophy in forest enginering:. Commencement in June 2005.Oregon State University-USA. p 21-22
Gotze U., 2008: Investitionsrechnung: Modelle und Analysen zur Beurteilung von Investitionsvorhaben. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Ishizaka, Allesio, Namery Philippe. 2013. A multy criteria groups decision frame work for partner grouping when sharing facilities. Groups Decision and Negotiation. Portmouth Business School-UK. Pages 1-28.
Meixner O., R. Haas, 2002. Computergestütze Entscheidungsfindung. Ahli Choise und AHP : inovatif werkzeuge zur Losung komplexer Probleme. Frankfur, Wien: Redline Wirtschaft.
Saaty, Thomas L. 2003. Decision-Making with the AHP; Why is the Principal eigenvector necessary: European Journal of Operational Research 145 (2003) p 85–91.
Saaty, Thomas L. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchical process: International Journal survices sciences Vol. 1 No.1 2008. p 83-98
Saaty Thomas L, Vargas LG (2001): Model, Metode, Konsep & Aplikasi Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boston et al: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tomić,V.,Marinković, Z.Janošević. D., 2011. Promethee method implementation with multi criteria decisions.. Mechanical Engineering Faculty, University of Niš, A. Medvedeva 14, Niš, Serbia, Mechanical Engineering Vol. 9, No 2, 2011, pp. 193- 202.
Yang, Jiaqin and Shi, Ping . 2002. Applying Analytic Hierarchical Process in firm overall performance evaluation; a case study in China. International of business (7) 1-2002 ISSN: 1083-4346, p. 29-45.
Young, K.D. 2006. Thesis: Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process Optimization Algorithm in Best Management Practice Selection: the faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. p 23-35.
Zimmer, S., Klumpp, M., Abidi, H.,2011. Industry project evaluation with the analytic hierarchical process. Institute for logistic and services management fom university of apllied science assen. Leimkugelstrabe 6-45141. Essen-Germany. www.fom-ild.de. Pages. 01-09.
Published
2015-03-07
How to Cite
Akmaludin, A. (2015). MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS MENENTUKAN POINT WEIGHT COMPARATION DALAM PENETAPAN DECISION PRIORITY. Jurnal Pilar Nusa Mandiri, 11(1), 11-19. Retrieved from https://ejournal.nusamandiri.ac.id/index.php/pilar/article/view/408
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2015 Akmaludin
An author who publishes in the Pilar Nusa Mandiri: Journal of Computing and Information System agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
