Diterbitkan Oleh:
Lembaga Penelitian Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Nusa Mandiri
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.
ANALISIS PENENTUAN WEIGHT PRIORITY MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN GEOMETRIC MEAN DENGAN METODE SUMVECTOR UNTUK PEMILIHAN FASILITASI DI LINGKUNGAN PERUMAHAN
Keywords:
Analytic Hierarchical Process, GEOMETRIC MEAN, METODE SUMVECTOR
Abstract
The method used in the development of the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) varies one time, including approaches using geometric averages. This approach uses a technique that is much different because it is done with a Multi-Criteria Analysis approach and its derivatives. In the selection of facilities in residential areas, it is necessary at all levels to measure the priorities of a number of criteria and sub-criteria used. Therefore the geometric mean approach is used as a barometer in the solution approach to determine its priority weights. There are several criteria used to assess the environment for selecting housing facilities that include criteria for benefits, the role of public contributions, the role of local government, and community aspects of these criteria. This criterion will be assessed as the main criterion in the discussion of this paper, which is used as an alternative while the viewing facilities include entertainment facilities, sports facilities, transportation facilities, and shopping facilities. From the discussion, this paper obtained the priority level of the synthesized value as follows: ranking of the first and subsequent decisions including transportation, entertainment facilities, shopping facilities, and final ranked sports facilities, with their respective predicates in the order, were 0.397; 0.273; 0.173; 0.157. The value of this decision is the final synthesis.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Saaty, Thomas L. 2003. Decision-Making with the AHP; Why is the Principal eigenvector necessary: European Journal of Operational Research 145 2003) p 85–91.
Ishizaka, Allesio, Namery Philippe. 2013. A multy criteria groups decision framework for partner grouping when sharing facilities. Groups Decision and Negotiation. Portmouth Business School-UK. Page 1-28.
Yang, Jiaqin and Shi, Ping . 2002. Applying Analytic Hierarchical Process in firm overall performance evaluation; a case study in China. International of business (7) 1-2002 ISSN: 1083-4346, p. 29-45.
Coulter, Elizabeth D. 2004. Setting forest road maintenance and upgrade priorities based on environment effects and expert judgment: A Dissertation doctor of philosophy in forest engineering:. Commencement in June 2005.Oregon State University-USA. p 21-22
Coulter, Elizabeth D., Coakley, J, Sessions, J. 2012. The analytic hierarchical process:
The tutorial for use in prioritizing forest Road investments to minimize environmental effects: International journal of forest engineering. Montana, USA. p 51-69
Saaty, Thomas L. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchical process: International Journal survices sciences Vol. 1 No.1 2008. p 83-98
Meixner O., R. Haas. 2002. Computergestütze Entscheidungsfindung. Ahli Choise und AHP : inovatif werkzeuge zur Losung komplexer Probleme. Frankfur, Wien: Redline Wirtschaft.
Gotze U. 2008. Investitionsrechnung: Modelle und Analysen zur Beurteilung von Investitionsvorhaben. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Saaty Thomas L, Vargas LG. 2001. Model, Metode, Konsep & Aplikasi Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boston et al: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Zimmer, S., Klumpp, M., Abidi, H. 2011. Industry project evaluation with the analytic hierarchical process. Institute for logistic and services management fom university of apllied science assen. Leimkugelstrabe 6-45141. EssenGermany. www.fom-ild.de. P.01-09.
Tomić,V.,Marinković, Z.Janošević. D. 2011. Promethee method implementation with multi criteria decisions.. Mechanical Engineering Faculty, University of Niš, A. Medvedeva 14, Niš, Serbia,Mechanical Engineering Vol. 9, No 2,2011, pp. 193 - 202
Ishizaka, Allesio, Namery Philippe. 2013. A multy criteria groups decision framework for partner grouping when sharing facilities. Groups Decision and Negotiation. Portmouth Business School-UK. Page 1-28.
Yang, Jiaqin and Shi, Ping . 2002. Applying Analytic Hierarchical Process in firm overall performance evaluation; a case study in China. International of business (7) 1-2002 ISSN: 1083-4346, p. 29-45.
Coulter, Elizabeth D. 2004. Setting forest road maintenance and upgrade priorities based on environment effects and expert judgment: A Dissertation doctor of philosophy in forest engineering:. Commencement in June 2005.Oregon State University-USA. p 21-22
Coulter, Elizabeth D., Coakley, J, Sessions, J. 2012. The analytic hierarchical process:
The tutorial for use in prioritizing forest Road investments to minimize environmental effects: International journal of forest engineering. Montana, USA. p 51-69
Saaty, Thomas L. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchical process: International Journal survices sciences Vol. 1 No.1 2008. p 83-98
Meixner O., R. Haas. 2002. Computergestütze Entscheidungsfindung. Ahli Choise und AHP : inovatif werkzeuge zur Losung komplexer Probleme. Frankfur, Wien: Redline Wirtschaft.
Gotze U. 2008. Investitionsrechnung: Modelle und Analysen zur Beurteilung von Investitionsvorhaben. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Saaty Thomas L, Vargas LG. 2001. Model, Metode, Konsep & Aplikasi Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boston et al: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Zimmer, S., Klumpp, M., Abidi, H. 2011. Industry project evaluation with the analytic hierarchical process. Institute for logistic and services management fom university of apllied science assen. Leimkugelstrabe 6-45141. EssenGermany. www.fom-ild.de. P.01-09.
Tomić,V.,Marinković, Z.Janošević. D. 2011. Promethee method implementation with multi criteria decisions.. Mechanical Engineering Faculty, University of Niš, A. Medvedeva 14, Niš, Serbia,Mechanical Engineering Vol. 9, No 2,2011, pp. 193 - 202
Published
2014-03-15
How to Cite
Akmaludin, A. (2014). ANALISIS PENENTUAN WEIGHT PRIORITY MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN GEOMETRIC MEAN DENGAN METODE SUMVECTOR UNTUK PEMILIHAN FASILITASI DI LINGKUNGAN PERUMAHAN. Jurnal Pilar Nusa Mandiri, 10(1), 1-9. Retrieved from https://ejournal.nusamandiri.ac.id/index.php/pilar/article/view/434
Article Metrics
Abstract viewed = 89 times
PDF downloaded = 85 times
Abstract viewed = 89 times
PDF downloaded = 85 times
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2014 Akmaludin
An author who publishes in the Pilar Nusa Mandiri: Journal of Computing and Information System agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
